Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2010 2:11:33 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Note: The following text is a quote:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/2010executive_order.pdf

- - - - - - -

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release January 11, 2010
EXECUTIVE ORDER

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS

By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of America,
including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization
Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen
further the partnership between the Federal Government and State
governments to protect our Nation and its people and property,
it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Council of Governors.
(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council).
The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by
the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of
the same political party. The term of service for each Member
appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member
may be reappointed for additional terms.
(b) The President shall designate two Members, who
shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as
Co-Chairs of the Council.

Sec. 2. Functions. The Council shall meet at the call
of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to
exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of
Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to
the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; the
Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and
Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Homeland Defense and Americas’ Security Affairs; the Commander,
United States Northern Command; the Chief, National Guard
Bureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate
officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the
Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other
executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the
Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Such views, information, or advice shall concern:
(a) matters involving the National Guard of the various
States;
(b) homeland defense;
(c) civil support;
more
(OVER)

2
(d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal
military activities in the United States; and
(e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining to
National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

Sec. 3. Administration.
(a) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an Executive
Director to coordinate the work of the Council.
(b) Members shall serve without compensation for their
work on the Council. However, Members shall be allowed travel
expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as
authorized by law.
(c) Upon the joint request of the Co-Chairs of
the Council, the Secretary of Defense shall, to the
extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of
appropriations, provide the Council with administrative support,
assignment or detail of personnel, and information as may be
necessary for the performance of the Council’s functions.
(d) The Council may establish subcommittees of the
Council. These subcommittees shall consist exclusively of
Members of the Council and any designated employees of a Member
with authority to act on the Member’s behalf, as appropriate to
aid the Council in carrying out its functions under this order.
(e) The Council may establish a charter that is consistent
with the terms of this order to refine further its purpose,
scope, and objectives and to allocate duties, as appropriate,
among members.

Sec. 4. Definitions. As used in this order:
(a) the term “State” has the meaning provided in
paragraph (15) of section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(6 U.S.C. 101(15)); and
(b) the term “Governor” has the meaning provided in
paragraph (5) of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(5)).

Sec. 5. General Provisions.
(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or
otherwise affect:
(1) the authority granted by law to a
department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(2) functions of the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget relating to budgetary,
administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent
with applicable law and subject to the availability of
appropriations.
more

3
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create
any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at
law or in equity by any party against the United States, its
departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or
agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 11, 2010.
###


2 posted on 01/12/2010 2:12:06 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

...and how many vacant positions remain in his administration?


3 posted on 01/12/2010 2:17:29 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

His signature has no standing.


4 posted on 01/12/2010 2:20:58 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Phobos, kerdos, and doxa, said the Time Traveler. “Fear, self-interest, and honor.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

I missed it; what part of the Constitution gives him the authority to federalize the governors of the states?


7 posted on 01/12/2010 2:28:17 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Obama: The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Thanks Cindy, this is indeed a scary event. This piece really alarmed me “synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.”
State & Federal Military activities... O NOOOOO!
I am an Oath Keeper!


8 posted on 01/12/2010 2:29:28 AM PST by momincombatboots (Ambition: climbing over others to make it; Passion: arriving while everyone enjoyed the climb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Related, and with more commentary of interest:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426271/posts


10 posted on 01/12/2010 3:26:28 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Bipartisan? One Democrat and nine Socialists?


12 posted on 01/12/2010 3:49:46 AM PST by Fresh Wind ("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
Just to stir the pot a little bit, this appears to be part of the FY 2008 NDAA, which means Bush actually put this into motion, not Obama, hes just carrying it out. After reading the actual act here the relevent portion is this:

SEC. 1822. <> COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS. The President shall establish a bipartisan Council of Governors to advise the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the White House Homeland Security Council on matters related to the National Guard and civil support missions

What other power the president wants to give this council outside of what is authorized is another question, but I think the purpose of having this council was so that Bush (or his successor since he had to leave in 09) would have his senior guys available in a ready made fourm to coord and plan reactions to major emergencies where the National Guard would be the main manpower contributor. The bill was enacted into law by the 110th Congress on 28 Jan 2008.

13 posted on 01/12/2010 4:23:38 AM PST by world weary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

This is to help bribe governors so they won’t assert the Tenth Amendment and duck out of health care. It’s probably unconstitutional, too.


14 posted on 01/12/2010 4:43:00 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Trojan Horse to expand Federal government into the states. The Governors should say no thanks.


19 posted on 01/12/2010 6:37:15 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

A Governor serves the people of his or her state. Not the “nation as a whole”.

This stinks to high heaven.


20 posted on 01/12/2010 7:12:02 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson