Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diamond Oceans Possible on Uranus, Neptune
Discovery ^ | 1/15/10 | Eric Bland

Posted on 01/17/2010 3:44:54 AM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: PIF
Even here on Earth they are plentiful - only tight control of the supply keeps them from becoming valueless, other than for industrial use...

Which is why I refuse to ever buy another diamond.

People should use common sense. Go to any mall and there are jewelry stores all over selling diamonds but yet they are supposed to be "rare".

21 posted on 01/17/2010 5:10:40 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I often expect good humorous comments from FR. But yours is one of the best in several years.


22 posted on 01/17/2010 5:11:26 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
Play fair - just because global warming is BS doesn't mean all scientists are BS-ers.

Listen to a group of Astrophysicists some time try to explain the unified theory. They are constantly making up the existence of particles they "think" exist to match the equations they come up with to explain the origins of the Universe, all the while acting as if these particles actually exist and have been observed. For anyone with an engineering background, it's downright comical.

23 posted on 01/17/2010 5:16:23 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
As explained in the article, when you heat up diamond it doesn't go directly from solid diamond to liquid diamond, but physically changes into graphite first. Then the graphite melts (which, of course, only tells you the melting point for graphite, but not diamond).
24 posted on 01/17/2010 5:16:42 AM PST by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

You’re right, once it melts it loses its crystal structure and becomes just a bunch of carbon atoms doing whatever. I’m guessing it’s considered liquid diamond because of the pressure they’re melting it at, which causes it to form diamond again when it cools rather than disorganized carbon.


25 posted on 01/17/2010 5:20:52 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
I marvel at real science, as a matter of fact my living depends on it.

Are you in the business of manufacturing Twinkies by chance?

26 posted on 01/17/2010 5:26:43 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I used to work at U.S. Steel. We had graphite up to six inches thick covering everything in the BOP shop. It played havoc with the resistor banks on the cranes.


27 posted on 01/17/2010 5:35:37 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

It’d be cool to go back there and take a couple of shovelfuls of graphite, toss it into your basic super-duper high pressure oven, and turn the graphite into a thousand caret diamond. Frustrating! We know how to do it. It’s just the technology getting in our way.


28 posted on 01/17/2010 5:52:07 AM PST by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Who said anything about manufacturing, Twinkie?

Soooooo, lets all just jump into our George Jetson Mobiles and fly up, over, around there and just grab a handfull for the glovebox.

Oh yea, George Jetson Mobiles haven’t been invented yet and if anyone here thinks this government is going to fund any kind of new space technology soon has truely got their heads in some other place not of this planet. They are already doing everything they can to cut the Constellation Project which was originated to replace the Shuttle Program.


29 posted on 01/17/2010 6:09:11 AM PST by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - Dockery for Gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Huh? "Scientist" were unable to give us precise temps and pressures? How is this possible?

They are talking 11 million atmospheres and 50,000 degrees (C or F?).

My tire guage and outside temperature guage don't hold up under these conditions.

But it looks as if the scientists here could use some proxies and come up with 'value added' temperatures and pressures.

It worked for Jones.

30 posted on 01/17/2010 6:21:06 AM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Yeah...and they got flying pigs also.


31 posted on 01/17/2010 6:36:15 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Has DeBeers purchased the rights yet?


32 posted on 01/17/2010 7:04:10 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Listen to a group of Astrophysicists some time try to explain the unified theory. They are constantly making up the existence of particles they "think" exist to match the equations they come up with to explain the origins of the Universe, all the while acting as if these particles actually exist and have been observed. For anyone with an engineering background, it's downright comical.

Yes, but these physicists are relatively harmless, and they at least follow the Theory > Hypothesis > Conclusion > Revised Theory flowchart.

The AGW 'priests' come up with a theory from incomplete or flawed observation; make little-to-no effort to create testable hypotheses; and yet 'demand' immediate reorganization of human civilization.

33 posted on 01/17/2010 7:13:10 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Yes, but these physicists are relatively harmless, and they at least follow the Theory > Hypothesis > Conclusion > Revised Theory flowchart.

Yeah, they have their own boondoggles, like the 54 mile, $12 billion hole in the ground we paid for in Texas that Congress canceled in 1993, aka, the Superconducting Super Collider. There are many other examples. They just don't get as much press as AGW. Plenty of waste to go around, all in the name of "science".....

34 posted on 01/17/2010 7:53:32 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

I would lay that boondoggle at the feet of Congress. The competing facility in CERN Switzerland has made significant scientific contributions — discoveries that would have been made in Texas if not for the cancellation.


35 posted on 01/17/2010 8:01:28 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
The competing facility in CERN Switzerland has made significant scientific contributions — discoveries that would have been made in Texas if not for the cancellation.

Really? Like what? Last I heard they were having trouble with it tripping breakers every time they try to bring it to full power. I have not heard of any significant new discoveries coming from the Swiss LHC yet. Doesn't mean that there haven't been any, I just haven't heard about it. Maybe I missed something. What did they find?

36 posted on 01/17/2010 8:35:50 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Well, Twinkies immediately jumped to mind when you mentioned your line of work relied on science. Twinkies are as much a technology as a food, packed as they are with synthetic compounds that only scientists understand.


37 posted on 01/17/2010 9:08:02 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Arthur Wildfire! March; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; Raycpa

DeBeers will be building a Death Star to take care of this problem.


38 posted on 01/18/2010 6:13:47 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Really? Like what? Last I heard they were having trouble with it tripping breakers every time they try to bring it to full power. I have not heard of any significant new discoveries coming from the Swiss LHC yet. Doesn't mean that there haven't been any, I just haven't heard about it. Maybe I missed something. What did they find?

Y'know what? You're right. They haven't really done any experiments beyond power-level tests with the LHC. They've had problems with the equipment & their website says that they are shutting down in 2010 for a systems upgrade.

Have to apologize to you & eat a little crow here. I thought I saw/heard something on the News a few weeks ago about the LHC at Cern. One of those stories that blows past you when your attention is divided. Could have been one of those year-end, filler-stories (as in "not really News)?

39 posted on 01/18/2010 6:35:25 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Impy

>:0)


40 posted on 01/18/2010 6:41:47 AM PST by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson