There are some here on FR that would sign it as long as it got rid of things they personally didn’t like. Say porn, for example.
or Sarah Palin...
That’s the problem: on what basis can a free people ban modes of expression that do not create actual hazards or which do not threaten force or inflict fraud? Our Constitution was in fact intended for a moral people, and is dependent for its survival upon one. But the enforcement of such morality must be drawn as narrowly as possible consistent with the fundamental purposes of self-government.
Otherwise, and in time, mere prejudices can come to supplant the objective rule of law.