Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genuine Healthcare Reform Starts by Reigning in the Lawyers
2/9/2010 | EnderWiggins

Posted on 02/09/2010 1:48:28 PM PST by EnderWiggins

This is a personal perspective, but it comes from having worked in Healthcare for more than a quarter century. You want to bring down the cost of healthcare? Start by reigning in the trial lawyers.

It is estimated that about 5% (and that's on the low side) of all medical procedures done in America today are unnecessary but performed specifically as “defensive medicine” to help protect the doctor or hospital from a malpractice lawsuit. Eliminating just that 5% would save $110 billion a year. This does not include any downstream benefit from reduced insurance premiums and litigation costs.

Medical Tort Reform should (IMHO) look something like this:

A. There should be no cap on objective monetary damages associated with actual costs such as ongoing medical care required by the malpractice, loss of income or necessary non-medical accommodations. But these are costs that must be actually identified and accounted for.

B. There absolutely should be a cap on subjective monetary damages associated with pain, suffering, loss of companionship… stuff like that. There is a reason we have such a hard time placing a dollar value on these things; you can't. And expecting an untrained random group of jurors to do a good job here is like rigging the lottery.

C. Punitive “awards” should serve the actual purpose of punishment exclusively. In the practice of medicine, actions that warrant punitive sanction are arguably criminal rather than civil in tone and tint. For the life of me, I have never understood why one person's punishment should enrich anybody else. So no lawyer or plaintiff should ever receive a penny in punitive damages.

If punishment is warranted the bias should be towards disciplinary actions rather than monetary sanctions, up to and including the loss of license and the right to practice medicine. If the acts actually are criminal, then jail time is deserved. But monetary awards… if assessed… should be returned to the health care system, not to plaintiffs or their lawyers. I.e. no third party should be “enriched” by the punishment of a physician or medical facility.

Thoughts?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: health; lawyers; reform; tort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2010 1:48:28 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

Rein-in or exterminate?


2 posted on 02/09/2010 1:49:48 PM PST by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

We need to eliminate medical lawsuits altogether. We need a general fund to compensate victims of real malpractice for real damage, and a believable way to weed out those guilty of malpractice.


3 posted on 02/09/2010 1:52:59 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
"Health Care Reform" has nothing to do with making health care literally cost less money. It only has to do with shuffling around the costs and the decision making process.

If Congress literally wanted health care to be less expensive, they could do so with a bill which could fit on the back of a cocktail napkin.
4 posted on 02/09/2010 1:57:04 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority ("My...health care plan is a Bolshevik plot... which will destroy America." - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

Uh...if that’s the case....Obomba FIRST!!!


5 posted on 02/09/2010 1:57:19 PM PST by goodnesswins (VOTE Democrat........DESTROY America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

As a general observation, litigation or the mere threat thereof, imposes huge costs on society. Virtually everything costs more because of it. The heath care arena would be an excellent place to start limiting excessive and frivolous litigation. A proof of concept if you will.


6 posted on 02/09/2010 1:59:23 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

yeah, as if the ambulance-chasers running the Democrat party would ever go for that.


7 posted on 02/09/2010 1:59:50 PM PST by ledzep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

Most medical malpractice cases take place at the state level. Limits at the federal level would have little impact, unless you are also suggesting these limits be imposed upon the states as well.


8 posted on 02/09/2010 2:05:23 PM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke.

Tennessee has joined several other states in trying to pass a Health Care Freedom Act. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011)

New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.

Obama's War on Seniors

Socialized Med Thread

9 posted on 02/09/2010 2:06:30 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
Photobucket

10 posted on 02/09/2010 2:09:19 PM PST by Dick Bachert (DIPLOMACY: THE ABILITY TO SAY "NICE DOGGY" WHILE GROPING FOR A LARGE ROCK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
TORT REFORM
11 posted on 02/09/2010 2:10:31 PM PST by JohnLongIsland ( schmuckie schucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
So no lawyer or plaintiff should ever receive a penny in punitive damages

You do realize that punitive damages are where the trial lawyers make their money.

Ergo, eliminating punitive damages would immediately cut down on the ambulance chasers and malpractice lawsuits.

Let's do it.

12 posted on 02/09/2010 2:12:36 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
My opinion--compensate for most "adverse outcomes"--that is, provide some compensation for when things go wrong even when the doctor is not at fault. I would call this no-fault bad outcome insurance. But the catch--it would be overseen by hospital boards and doctors, not lawyers.

A doctor could admit freely of an error in these circumstances, instead of doing CYA.

13 posted on 02/09/2010 2:14:34 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
"You do realize that punitive damages are where the trial lawyers make their money."

Why... yes. That did cross my mind!!

LOL
14 posted on 02/09/2010 2:18:06 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Actually... that’s a great idea.

Trial lawyers always complain that no one would take these cases if they couldn’t make a boatload of money, and therefore real victims would suffer. Well... here you show that those two issues are completely independent of each other.


15 posted on 02/09/2010 2:20:53 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

And what prey tell oh mighty wizard would this so called reform of yours ( on the back of a cocktail naokin no less) do?


16 posted on 02/09/2010 2:23:05 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the long march

Place a cap on malpractice lawsuits. Cap lawyer fees. Allow more doctors to emigrate to this country. Ensure portability of insurance across state lines.


17 posted on 02/09/2010 2:25:34 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority ("My...health care plan is a Bolshevik plot... which will destroy America." - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

doctor’s protect themselves by doing too many tests and procedures. Because we have become a litigious society people expect no risk and perfect outcomes. Never a good thing


18 posted on 02/09/2010 2:25:56 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins
If you know medicine, then you know that our present adversarial situation prevents doctors from taking responsibility even when they want to. The stakes are just too high to do the right thing by patients under the present system, where we turn lawyers into bounty hunters.

But I'm not talking winning the lottery. What I have in mind would be more like unemployment insurance or worker's comp. Not enough to tempt a lawyer.

19 posted on 02/09/2010 2:27:49 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggins

meanwhile on the Democrat side, look for the trial lawyers and their minions to go absolutely ape doo-doo over John Murtha being allegedly a victim of medical malpractice.


20 posted on 02/09/2010 2:35:44 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson