Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Update on Obama's Photoshopped Fake Background History Pictures
Official Obama Pictures, with analysis

Posted on 02/24/2010 3:59:44 PM PST by capacommie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: capacommie

Very interesting.


141 posted on 03/30/2011 10:33:42 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Thanks for the ping!


142 posted on 03/30/2011 10:34:13 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: sten

save for later


143 posted on 03/30/2011 1:30:19 PM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; arasina; Natural Born 54; PhilDragoo; LucyT
Maybe it would help if I explained HOW that Central Park sequence came about?

I saw the original image, supposedly taken sometime in 1980 - "when the Dunhams came to visit zero..." in New York. It looked odd to me. Zero looked, IMO, as if he had been inserted between Stanley Armour and Madelyn.

It was the placement and posture of Stanley Armour and Madelyn that alerted me...zero is 'fitted' between them both like a piece of jig-saw puzzle. I then asked Freeper PhilDragoo to REMOVE ZERO. And presto - now the elderly couple are back in the position they were in originally.

And Phil added a touch of humour, he placed zero BEHIND the wall.

Meanwhile I had found an image of zero SITTING ON HIS OWN on a wall in Central Park, WEARING THE SAME CLOTHES.

Which might suggest that a POSE to suit the position he is shown in - with Stanley Armour and Madelyn on the bench was CREATED for the purpose...to allow him to be INSERTED.

NOW LOOK AGAIN AT THE WALL!

While we look at the PEOPLE - we miss something very important. HAVE YOU EVER SEEN ANYTHING SO SHODDY?

There are a number of benches along that wall, the above is just ONE of them...

IT SEEMS OBVIOUS TO ME THE IMAGE IS A TOTAL FAKE. ALTHOUGH FEATURED IN A COLLECTION OF IMAGES BY TIME MAGAZINE...(at least they DIDN'T CROP THE WALL!) Most images are CROPPED...and for good reason.

TIME MAGAZINE SOURCE

144 posted on 03/30/2011 8:13:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks FN.


145 posted on 03/30/2011 8:35:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000
What was he doing in Pakistan in 1981, and on what citizenship basis.

Where are his early girlfriends. Frank Marshall Davis from age 9 through 18. Bill Ayer's wife Bernadette Dohrn connected Michelle and Obama at Dohrn's law firm, a loveless, sexless power partnership in the manner of Hillary Rodham and William Jefferson Clinton.

Is he truly DNA-linked to the very black, very absent Barak Sr. or is he the seed of Frank Marshall Davis (see the pictures of Commie Mommie in the Windy City apartment) or even of Malcolm Little aka Malcolm X.

No certificate, sanitized passport file—John Brennan's Analysis Corp. employed the subcontractor who did that work, and Brennan was first choice for Director of Central Intelligence and is National Security Advisor, another who cannot say Islamist and terrorist in the same sentence.

Who is the Islamo-Communist stooge occasionally in the Oval Office when not on the golf course or basketball court.


146 posted on 03/31/2011 1:05:34 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; LucyT

THE ONE THING I AM SURE OF IS THAT FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS WASN'T HIS FATHER...AND FRANKS' SON, MARK IS THE SPITTING IMAGE OF THE CHINLESS WONDER NAMED FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.

147 posted on 03/31/2011 2:13:54 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

There’s another discrepancy in the photo that includes 0 that I just noticed this morning and which I don’t think I have ever seen mentioned before. Just between 0’s and Stanley’s shoulders there is a small triangle that is part of the wall. It is blue and it should be black as it is in Phil’s reconstruction. It is not part of Stanley’s suit because the edge of his sleeve is easily defined and not wrinkled. It is not his extended arm because to do that would have caused his shoulder to be lifted and probably a some kind of wrinkles in the shoulder area and there are none. Also if his arm were extended to somehow meet up with that hand on 0’s shoulder that triangle would not even be visible. And if 0 were actually sitting there that little triangle would not only be black because that is what color the wall is but it would also be black because of 0’s shadow.


148 posted on 03/31/2011 9:22:15 AM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

0 didn’t have a roommate when he went to high school. He lived in his grandma’s apartment.


149 posted on 03/31/2011 9:36:26 AM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All

b


150 posted on 03/31/2011 9:39:08 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Albertafriend

That entire image is obviously fake on so many levels...aside from the way the wall has been destroyed and poorly reconstructed (to make way for the insertion of zero) - look how he has been posed. Sitting in almost the identical position (arms, shoulders, legs etc)so that he would fit between them...and where might Stanley Armour’s hand have been - on his own leg!


151 posted on 03/31/2011 1:52:28 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

capacommie has been banned.

I love me some of your graphic! Excellent, Phil!


152 posted on 04/01/2011 12:09:17 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 ("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2010/09/fraudulent-photographic-history-of-aka.html

This is a really good analysis.


153 posted on 04/04/2011 5:27:42 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

bump


154 posted on 04/07/2011 6:22:25 PM PDT by crosshairs (Say what you want about the South, but you never hear of anyone retiring and moving north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

You’re right - interesting...

My question is: why would anyone bother doctoring all these photos? Seems like overkill...

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/nicoloffthreestooges6part25apr09.shtml


155 posted on 04/07/2011 8:29:31 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs
Hey, thanks for the ping. Some of these Photoshops are indeed ridiculous. As somebody who makes a bunch just for fun, I wouldn't even post some of these because they even look stupid for Photoshops, let alone passing them off as actual untouched photographs.

I do much better work. Here's one I created with Obama and the failed Times Square bomber. I even fooled me when I was finished.


156 posted on 04/07/2011 9:54:18 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: dead
See if you can spot the subtle Photoshop in this one:


157 posted on 04/07/2011 10:02:11 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

How many of the Time imags are photo-shopped?


158 posted on 04/08/2011 6:19:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They might ALL be for all we know. TIME MAGAZINE published the image of the three of them sitting on the bench in Central Park, where THEY got it from, I have no idea.


159 posted on 04/08/2011 6:58:47 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
The guy to Barry’s right also has NO highlights; weird.

That is the most off thing in the photo.

160 posted on 04/08/2011 8:43:15 PM PDT by Bellflower (Isa 32:5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said [to be] bountiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson