Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5,200 Australians bare all for photo shoot
AP ^ | March 1, 2010

Posted on 03/01/2010 9:11:38 AM PST by ConservativeStatement

SYDNEY—About 5,200 naked people embraced each other on the steps of Sydney's iconic Opera House on Monday for a photo shoot by Spencer Tunick.

Tunick, who is known for his nude group photos in public spaces, posed participants for more than an hour in a variety of positions.

"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa," Tunick said. "So I was very happy that that last set up finally got done and everyone came together (in a) united, friendly kiss, a loving kiss in front of this great structure."

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography
KEYWORDS: australians; homosexualagenda; naked; nude; publicitystunt; publicnudity; tunick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Someone was overheard asking if those were falsettos. /sarc.
1 posted on 03/01/2010 9:11:39 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

No photos please!!!


2 posted on 03/01/2010 9:16:35 AM PST by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

If you’re gonna make it big as an artiste, you gotta have a gimmick, wrapping landmarks in cellophane, sliced cows in formaldehyde, photographing weimaraners in fancy dress, etc.


3 posted on 03/01/2010 9:17:30 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Without seeing the pictures, I bet those are not the same 5200 nude Australians I would have picked for a photo shoot.


4 posted on 03/01/2010 9:17:43 AM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Wow.

PT Barnum was right.


5 posted on 03/01/2010 9:18:27 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimmyMc
No photos please!!!

Most definitely...just because they bare all, doesn't mean we have to bear the sight of it!

6 posted on 03/01/2010 9:18:30 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
It was difficult to get the straight normal participants to embrace the gay perverted participants...." Tunick said.

And the truly nauseating part is that this clown can't understand *why* that was the case.

7 posted on 03/01/2010 9:19:34 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk; Revolting cat!

The cool thing about getting 5,000 people to pose for a photo is that you can expect at least several hundred of them to line up and BUY a print later. KaCHING!


8 posted on 03/01/2010 9:22:35 AM PST by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

He said “and vice versa”. Does this mean that they were heterophobic?


9 posted on 03/01/2010 9:23:17 AM PST by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimmyMc

10 posted on 03/01/2010 9:26:09 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,"

Right. We know how reserved and shy those gays are. (eyes rolling)

Tunick, who is known for his nude group photos in public spaces, posed participants for more than an hour in a variety of positions.

It's called porn.

11 posted on 03/01/2010 9:26:11 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,"

Gross.


12 posted on 03/01/2010 9:26:31 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Our politicians are stupid and our policies unsustainable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Throw another bare ass on the barbie.....


13 posted on 03/01/2010 9:29:24 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
Without seeing the pictures, I bet those are not the same 5200 nude Australians I would have picked for a photo shoot.

Having walked several beaches near Sydney on hot summer days I can assure you that there are some *very* healthy young sheilas to be seen in Oz (didn't pay much attention to the blokes)!

14 posted on 03/01/2010 9:32:16 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
It's called porn.

Only if you get sexually excited from old, fat, naked people standing doing absolutely nothing in public... but, hey, more power to you.

Main Entry: por·nog·ra·phy
Pronunciation: \-fē\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek pornographos, adjective, writing about
prostitutes, from pornē prostitute + graphein to write;
akin to Greek pernanai to sell, poros journey — more at fare, carve
Date: 1858
1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
15 posted on 03/01/2010 9:34:06 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975; Aussie Dasher; myknowledge
Ping
16 posted on 03/01/2010 9:35:22 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
He said “and vice versa”. Does this mean that they were heterophobic?

I have more phobias than you can even begin to imagine! ;-)

17 posted on 03/01/2010 9:37:11 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Does this get your UFO ping?
.
.
.
Ugly Fat Ol’ People...


18 posted on 03/01/2010 9:41:19 AM PST by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
straight participants to embrace the gay participants

If I had to guess, the problem was more getting straights to embrace people of the same sex, and gays to embrace people of the opposite sex.

19 posted on 03/01/2010 9:50:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

“It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,”.....

I hope they have Bareasspalooza in front of the White House when it comes to the U.S.!


20 posted on 03/01/2010 10:03:15 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson