Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firefox plans fix for decade-old browsing history leak
The Register ^ | 5 April 2010 | Dan Goodin

Posted on 04/06/2010 1:25:41 PM PDT by ShadowAce

Firefox developers say they're close to plugging an information leakage hole that has plagued every major browser for more than a decade.

The cascading style sheets history attack makes it easy for web masters to compile vast lists of links visitors have previously viewed. It exploits technology in virtually every browser that causes visited links to be displayed in purple rather than blue. Mozilla has classified the weakness as a bug since at least 2002.

But fixing it has proved to be a vexing problem, largely because programmers didn't know how to close the hole without breaking key web functionality. Many proposed fixes threatened to bring browsers to a crawl or prevent users from knowing whether they had previously visited a website, trade-offs Mozilla, Microsoft and other browser makers have largely considered unacceptable.

Now, Mozilla security team member Sid Stamm says the hole will soon be closed in the open-source browser in a way that won't sacrifice usability. It incorporates technical changes designed to prevent the three most common attacks based on layout, timing and computed style of links.

"A few websites may look a little different, but visited links will still show up differently colored," he wrote here. "A few sites that use more than color to differentiate visited links may look slightly broken at first while they adjust to these changes, but we think it's the right trade-off to be sure we protect our users' privacy." (Additional technical details are here.)

Web application security expert Robert "RSnake" Hansen wasn't nearly as optimistic. In a blog post he said Mozilla's approach only makes it harder to exploit the weakness, rather than eliminating it.

"So let's not pat ourselves on the back too much here - it seems with every hole fixed there's two more that pop up and even when identified they take way too long to fix," he wrote. "I don't mean to harp on the Mozilla guys too much - at least they have a fix in the works. But that doesn't change the fact that we appear to be playing a very losing game of whack a mole."

It's also worth noting that most of the attacks can be eliminated by blocking a site's ability to run Javascript. That means users of the NoScript add-on for Firefox will in many cases be protected against the attack. Then again, it's getting harder and harder to do anything online without Javascript. Any site that has the ability to run code also has the ability to silently pilfer your browsing history.

And that means the changes by Mozilla are a step in the right direction, even if they don't completely eliminate the problem. Stamm has called on other browser makes to follow suit, which would also be a step in the right direction. The Register has placed queries with Google, Microsoft and Opera Software about their plans and will update this article with any responses. ®


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: browser; firefox; mozilla; security

1 posted on 04/06/2010 1:25:41 PM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 04/06/2010 1:25:59 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

thanks


3 posted on 04/06/2010 1:28:05 PM PDT by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
It's also worth noting that most of the attacks can be eliminated by blocking a site's ability to run Javascript. That means users of the NoScript add-on for Firefox will in many cases be protected against the attack. Then again, it's getting harder and harder to do anything online without Javascript.

I used to use noscript but I had to shut it for most sites just to view any content so what's the point?

4 posted on 04/06/2010 2:19:44 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

firefox does not work on my 2 win 7 pcs.

it crashes often.


5 posted on 04/06/2010 2:20:21 PM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

I was having the same problem on Vista. FF is now up to FF 3.6.3. Some of the problems went away. Realplayer had to upgrade, too.

parsy, who just installed the no script thing but has no idea what google gears is, or silverlight, in spite of reading about them.


6 posted on 04/06/2010 2:35:22 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I’m less concerned about a history leak than the damn memory leak that has been persistent from version 0.7 to the current 3.5-3.6 versions.

I have tried a few of the memory clearing add-ons, but none of them actually work. The only method to clear the large wad of memory Firefox consumes and refuses to release is to shut Firefox down and restart it.

Some early versions of MS Word exhibited similar memory consumption, which it would not release until Word was closed. Microsoft eventually found a solution and plugged the leak. Too bad Firefox can’t seem to find a solution.


7 posted on 04/06/2010 2:37:57 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Thanks


8 posted on 04/06/2010 5:09:12 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

I have two laptops with 7 and run strictly FF. Never crashes.


9 posted on 04/06/2010 8:16:33 PM PDT by raybbr (I hate B(ig) H(ead) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

i had firefox on vista and xp with no problems.

when i purchased and installed firefox,

it crashes.


10 posted on 04/06/2010 8:57:52 PM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken21
i had firefox on vista and xp with no problems. when i purchased and installed firefox, it crashes.

I am assuming you meant when you installed 7?

Did you install 7 as an upgrade to XP or was it a clean install?

The problem is almost certainly not FF.

11 posted on 04/07/2010 3:57:26 AM PDT by raybbr (I hate B(ig) H(ead) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Try Chrome instead.


12 posted on 04/07/2010 4:10:18 AM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlanD

Opera.

Speed Dial is very cool.

I’ve pretty much given up on FireFox.

Sites that don’t render well in Opera are few and far between. On the rare occasion that issue shows up, I use IE.


13 posted on 04/07/2010 5:10:55 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

The best thing about Chrome is that it now has Extensions, or applets that work with it, as Firefox does.

I am not sure about Opera, but I do use miniOpera on my cell phone for internet browsing.


14 posted on 04/07/2010 5:14:26 AM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AlanD

If you get a chance, check out Opera and its “widgets.” Lots of fun add-ons.

I’ve heard nothing but good things about Chrome. Its that whole “Google” thing that bothers me.


15 posted on 04/07/2010 5:17:33 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

clean install.


16 posted on 04/07/2010 8:37:46 AM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AlanD

Why am I not surprised that you would suggest Chrome. Google=obongo butt buddies.


17 posted on 05/22/2010 7:30:41 PM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson