Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin talks about how the democratic party was the party of slavery (reality)
Mark Levin ^ | 4/7/2010

Posted on 04/09/2010 11:59:07 AM PDT by llevrok

I heard this on Mark's show Tuesday and thought it a brilliant analysis on the roots of the Democrat party.

Dems complain about some one recognizing their Southern rebel roots, but ignore the Democrat party's pro slavery/bigoted roots

Worthwhile, I hope, wortwhile for all to hear if you did not on Tuesday.About 7 mins. long.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: levin; marklevin

1 posted on 04/09/2010 11:59:08 AM PDT by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Mark Levin talks about how the democratic party was the party of slavery

they still are....between the plantation system and taking away our constitutional rights...

2 posted on 04/09/2010 12:01:07 PM PDT by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

It still is!


3 posted on 04/09/2010 12:01:45 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
While I do not necessarily agree with this, the counter argument is:

The Democrats that were pro-slavery/pro-Jim Crow became Republicians.

4 posted on 04/09/2010 12:03:20 PM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Slave economics, race repression, Jim Crow, lynch mobs, fire hoses, bombed out churches, white robes and burning crosses, that is the Democratic Party’s history.

Never put yourself in the position of trying to defend their history. Its theirs, let them own it, let them defend it, let them explain it away.

They are forever trying to re-write history, and if that was my history I’d try to re-write it too. Don’t make it easy for them. Just throw it right back on them. Its theirs.


5 posted on 04/09/2010 12:04:07 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged
The Democrats that were pro-slavery/pro-Jim Crow became Republicians.

If that was your history, you'd say that too.

The Democrats who became Republicans accepted our view. The ones who remained Democrats are to this day obsessed with race politics.

6 posted on 04/09/2010 12:05:40 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron

Show the democrats this web site and ask them exactly when did the Democrats and Republicans switch and where is the documentation that anything like that happened? Why did Senator Byrd never renounce being a Grand Kleagle of the KKK?

http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/


7 posted on 04/09/2010 12:21:18 PM PDT by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged
"The Democrats that were pro-slavery/pro-Jim Crow became Republicians."

That argument doesn't hold water since the Republican party was founded by Christians, abolitionists, free blacks and anti-slavery activists who wanted to put an end to the abomination of slavery.

8 posted on 04/09/2010 12:22:14 PM PDT by GloriaJane (Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Mark Levin talks about how the democratic party was the party of slavery

Still is.


9 posted on 04/09/2010 12:23:31 PM PDT by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane
Sorry, my first post came out funny. Here is how it was supposed to be.
"The Democrats that were pro-slavery/pro-Jim Crow became Republicians."

That argument doesn't hold water since the Republican party was founded by Christians, abolitionists, free blacks and anti-slavery activists who wanted to put an end to the abomination of slavery.

10 posted on 04/09/2010 12:25:07 PM PDT by GloriaJane (Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Klemper

Thank you. Good post.

I still remember the bad old days and I know what Republicans believed during those days, and I remember what Democrats thought of us for believing it.

What happened is this: we won the argument. With race eliminated as an issue for many people, a lot of Democrats joined the GOP. The ones who did, did so because they accepted our view. A few well known dixiecrats joined us, but most of the old dixiecrats remained in the Democrat Party, which is right where they belonged.

We are essentially right where we have always been; color-blind citizenship. The Democrats have shifted; they aren’t as bad on race as they were during the bad old days but they still can’t turn loose of it, they can’t help themselves, they still see the world through an ethnic lens and inevitably, incurably use race politics as an instrument of power. Its who they are.


11 posted on 04/09/2010 12:31:58 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Unassuaged
Actually, most of them just died off. In the 50's and 60's south Republicans were on the same KKK death squad lists with blacks, Jews, and Catholics. Areas of the south where Republicans had any numbers and political strength at that time were the same regions which supported the Union cause in the Civil War, i.e. Eastern Kentucky, Western Virginia, and the mountainous areas of the Carolinas. My father's ancestry is from that region and the family has been solidly Republican since that time. His grandfather (my great grandfather) fought with a volunteer Kentucky regiment in the Union Army.

The most virulent racists (whether it was against blacks or, as in the case of Andrew Jackson Indian tribes like the Cherokee - another part of my ancestry) have always been card carrying Democrats. Goebbels could have only dreamed about the kind of successful "Big Lie" propaganda that has for fifty years been foisted on the US public by the American press on behalf of the Democratic Party.

12 posted on 04/09/2010 12:36:02 PM PDT by katana (Interesting Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Here are two great video productions outlining the history of the racist democrat party and how they have continually fought against equal rights to representation for all.

Setting The Record Straight: Pt. 1
http://server.depardeux.com/~nmatvco/view_video.php?viewkey=6fb0a03bb19f2d8d9524

Setting The Record Straight: Pt. 2
http://server.depardeux.com/~nmatvco/view_video.php?viewkey=9336a670e36d0ed79bc4

This history is getting more known and I have been hounding left-wingers with these facts alot lately being how they want to call the Tea Party racist.

Many on the left will try and comeback with the argument that the two parties switched with all of the racist democrats becoming republicans and vice-versa. This is simply an absurd argument and should simply be mocked and laughed at. The fact is that the progressive movement itself was incredibly racist and continually fought against equal rights to representation for all. Many of the policies followed by the left-wing progressives today originated from the racist progressive movement of the past.

Separation of Church and State: The first time religious expression in government or the public square was objected to was by democrats who boycotted services simply because republicans were inviting blacks to the services. The entire doctrine of Separation of Church and State was brought about even by a racist progressive Justice appointed by FDR who was a KKK member and defended the KKK in Court.

Of course even though this left-wing ideology was created based upon racism the left-wing still holds it sacred today.

Abortion: Margaret Sanger is well known as a racist and spoke many times with the KKK. Abortion was being promoted by the progressives to do away with undesirables. Even Justice Ginsburg has said as much recently.

Of course even though this left-wing ideology was created based upon racism the left-wing still holds it sacred today.

Many of the progressive movement’s policies are geared around creating a form of government that does not give equal rights to representation for all. They seek to use the Court to dictate issues thus denying people the right to representation.

The progressive taxation system favored by the progressive movement also deny people “equal protection under the law” being that one group of people live under one law which takes and takes from them while another group of people live under another law whereas nothing is taken or that other people’s property is given to them. The law is supposed to protect all people equally but the progressive movement has always fought against this.


13 posted on 04/09/2010 1:02:33 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson