Social housing in Northern Ireland does not comply with human rights standards

Researchers at Queen's University Belfast will publish their report, 'Budgeting for Social Housing: A Human Rights Analysis,' Monday, June 28

Social housing provision in Northern Ireland is not adequately funded to comply with international human rights standards. That's according to researchers at Queen's University Belfast, who publish their report, Budgeting for Social Housing: A Human Rights Analysis, today (Monday 28th June).

Human rights experts at Queen's School of Law have analysed the Northern Ireland government's spending on social housing, and have found that that it does not comply with international legal obligations to use the maximum available resources to ensure progressive realisation of the right to adequate housing.

Since devolution, there has been a significant increase in the waiting list for social housing which currently stands at approximately 40,000 households. There has also been a rise in 'housing stress' and households 'presenting as homeless'. The report finds that in this context, insufficient funding for new social housing represents a violation of international human rights law.

The report makes a number of recommendations to the Northern Ireland Executive and Assembly, including:

* Funding for new social housing must increase if government is to comply with its obligations under international human rights laws. * The government must ensure that the price paid for land - a crucial resource for the right to adequate housing - does not unduly benefit advantaged groups such as landowners, at the expense of taxpayers and those in need of social housing. In particular, practices such as land banking (leaving land dormant in the expectation that it will be zoned for development, multiplying its market value) must be tackled. * While the proposals for increased protection for tenants in the private rented sector are very welcome, the private rented sector should not be seen as a long term solution to the housing crisis. In particular it is of concern that housing benefit payments are being diverted into the private sector through payments to private landlords.

Dr Rory O'Connell, speaking on behalf of the Queen's Budget Analysis Project Team said:

"Adequate housing is a basic human right, essential to human dignity, security and wellbeing. Under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Northern Ireland Executive and Assembly are legally bound to use their resources to maximum effect in ensuring the right to adequate housing.

"While a considerable amount of revenue was raised under the House Sales Scheme, the budget for new social housing has not been not adequately resourced to ensure sufficient levels of new build to address the increases in waiting lists and homelessness. With more homes being sold than built, the social housing stock has decreased from 176,000 homes in 1987 to around 116,000 today."

The report highlights that, against the backdrop of insufficient funding, certain social housing responsibilities were shifted to housing associations in 1998 because of their ability to borrow additional private funding – a power which has been denied to the Northern Ireland Housing Executive under HM Treasury rules.

Dr O'Connell continued: "While we welcome the additional funding accessed through housing association borrowing, their loans are repaid using money that is either provided or forgone by the State. Therefore the effect of this system of funding is to keep government debt 'off the books'. In addition, there are some negative consequences which cannot be ignored. Housing associations, as private organisations, may not be able to borrow money on as favourable terms as a public body such as the Housing Executive, if that body were empowered to borrow.

"Rent rates for housing association dwellings are generally higher than for those owned by the Housing Executive, making the housing less affordable. And there are potential gaps in the accountability and transparency of housing associations, making it difficult to ensure human rights obligations are being met."

Due to the lack of social housing stock, the report claims an ever increasing number of those who receive housing benefits have been forced to seek accommodation in the private rented sector.

Dr O'Connell said: "Approximately 57,000 tenants in the private rented sector are currently in receipt of housing benefits. This is not ideal. Rents paid into the social sector are reinvested in social housing while those paid into the private sector go to landlords. As many tenants in the private rented sector receive housing benefit, this means that tax payers' money is effectively subsidising the private rented sector. Also, the private rented sector does not protect tenants' rights to the same degree as the social sector does.

"While some may argue that social housing should not be a priority in the current economic context, if anything, human rights and the protection of the most vulnerable assume even greater importance at such a time. Those who missed out on the benefits of prosperity should not be further denied their rights in a difficult economic climate."

Budgeting for Social Housing: A Human Rights Analysis is available online at http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/Research/HumanRightsCentre/ResearchProjects/BudgetAnalysis/ from Tuesday 29 June.

The report is the first in a series of papers that will be published by the Budget Analysis Project at Queen's School of Law as part of its Budget Analysis Project. Funded by Atlantic Philanthropies, the two year project will examine public expenditure in Northern Ireland using economic and social rights based budget analysis. The Project Team includes Professor Colin Harvey, Dr Aoife Nolan, Dr Rory O'Connell, Ms Mira Dutschke and Mr Eoin Rooney. Ms Jennie Finlay provides clerical support.

For more information visit http://www.law.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/Research/HumanRightsCentre/ResearchProjects/BudgetAnalysis/

Media inquiries to Anne-Marie Clarke on 028 9097 5320 or anne-marie.clarke@qub.ac.uk

The report will be launched at 3.30pm on Monday June 28 in the Great Hall, Queen's University of Belfast.

The number of households 'in housing stress' refers to applicants who, with 30 or more points under the Common Selection Scheme, are most in need of social housing.

The number of households 'presenting as homeless' refers to persons who apply to be considered as homeless. There is a strict legal test for eligibility for assistance for homelessness. In brief, a person is homeless if he or she has no accommodation in Northern Ireland, or there is there is no accommodation which it would be reasonable to expect that person to use.

The House Sales Scheme was introduced in Northern Ireland following its adoption in England and Wales with the Housing Act 1980. The Scheme enabled sitting social housing tenants to purchase their home at a discount of the market price.

Housing is very topical. The Commission on the Future for Housing in Northern Ireland produced its report in May, while the Participation and the Practice of Rights project held an inquiry in to housing on 24 June 2010.

it does not comply with international legal obligations to use the maximum available resources to ensure progressive realisation of the right to adequate housing.

huh?

"...found that that it does not comply with international legal obligations to use the maximum available resources to ensure progressive realisation of the right to adequate housing..."

What the hell is this?
What international obligations?
Who defined those obligations? What authority do they enjoy to create those "obligations?" Who gave it to them?

And above all else, how many divisions do they have to "enforce" those obligations?"

Last but not least, do any or all of these "obligations" violate our U.S. Constitutional rights?

Those rights are never, under any circumstances subject to a popular vote by countries who have no concept of "rights."

End of really dumb discussion.

Gotta love the euphemism “social housing”. Apparently they realize that calling it what it really is — socialIST housing — won’t sell well politically. It’s an Orwellian word game, though, designed to discourage people from being “against” it, since obviously if you’re against “social housing”, you must be FOR “anti-social housing”.

“Approximately 57,000 tenants in the private rented sector are currently in receipt of housing benefits. This is not ideal. Rents paid into the social sector are reinvested in social housing while those paid into the private sector go to landlords. As many tenants in the private rented sector receive housing benefit, this means that tax payers’ money is effectively subsidising the private rented sector.”

If I follow this logic, landlords should not rent to people “on the dole.”

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.