Posted on 07/21/2010 1:26:08 AM PDT by tired_old_conservative
I hate to be sceptical, but based on this cad's past, can we believe any of this is true?.
And that really cuts to the core of the matter. Since we know he is not trustworthy, how can we believe, in a real way, anything he says or does or is written about him?
I do not trust anything, nothing, anything, about this guy.
No. 08A524
Title:
Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008 Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 7 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 23, 2009.
Jan 7 2009 Application (08A524) referred to the Court.
Jan 13 2009 Suggestion for recusal received from applicant.
Jan 22 2009 Supplemental brief of applicant Gail Lightfoot, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2009 Application (08A524) denied by the Court.
I was just pointing you to that article for why she would not be available to appear at the White House because of her death. Wiki is hyped by anyone that chooses to write the stuff or amend what is written so like you I don’t put much faith most of the stuff. Her death I don’t think would be in dispute.
Crazy people usually do.
Among others on the link you gave for Taitz’s site is:
“Taitz also provided information, that the social security number used by Mr. Obama, 042-68-4425, was issued in the state of CT, while he resided in Hi, and it was issued to an elderly individual, born in 1890.”
Well, I´ll guess I´ll just have to try to live with your disgust but uncritically supporting people who through their own incompetance make laughing stocks of the issue isn´t a bright position, IMHO.
your conclusion is partically true, running a name does not prove guilt. BUT , barrack hussion obama is a rare in America. What are the odds of a number of citizens in the same college town have the same name, and these same “citizens “ appear to have followered obama as he moved across the country. I have a background in law enforcement , if I ran across this , I would be checking for fraud. But since everything relating to obama is sealed, my investigation would be blocked.
Maybe Orly can be labeled racist?
I think the NAACP should quickly find a reluctant witness to report Orly used the N-word, and she called Michelle fat too.
Maybe Orly can be labeled racist?
I think the NAACP should quickly find a reluctant witness to report Orly used the N-word, and she called Michelle fat too.
Yes, it would have been interesting if they checked for the full name, but they didn't. They didn't confirm that these people even had the name of Barack Obama, much less Barack Hussein Obama.
What are the odds of a number of citizens in the same college town have the same name, and these same “citizens “ appear to have followered obama as he moved across the country
I believe that's a mischaracterization to some extent. Please explain.
I have a background in law enforcement , if I ran across this , I would be checking for fraud.
I agree that there are questions. That's what's so frustrating with these bird-brained filings of Orly Taitz. I don't go so far as those who think she's a plant who was there to disrupt serious investigation--I think she's just incompetent and nutty. (IANAL, but lawyers I trust say her filings deserved the fines she's been assessed.)
Since you're law enforcement, you should be able to confirm that SSN often links to geography, but not always, especially for someone who might have been processed through an ARO.
The ever failing attack on “tone” instead of substance. Cos we all know Obama is ineligible, he admitted his father was British/Kenyan
So can you tell me a “birther” who has asked the question respectfully and appropriately and gotten any “answer” and right to discovery in any of our courts?
Oh yeah...like when Woodrow Wilson was ineligible to be president because his mother was English.
Imagine if we'd let Andrew Jackson become president? Why, BOTH his parents were foreign-born!
Oh, who is it on the $20 bill?
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.
(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..
Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
___________________________________
A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:
Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.
She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!
She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a ‘mail order’ attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our ‘great’ attorneys and ‘patriots’ who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.
So let’s get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots don’t need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. That’s why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.
HELP HER!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcChG5pRTOE&feature=player_embedded
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
Being a jerk won’t persuade the disinclined to the truth faster.
Orly is being a jerk.
To the contrary, she’s wrecking the cause.
Winning before SCOTUS requires long, persistent precision and politeness (as learned the hard way by many other causes such as RKBA). if you don’t win, refine your argument and tone and try again; switching to whiny bitch mode is counterproductive.
You need to still explain the Barak Obama whose number says he was born in Connecticut in the late 1800’s and was used at one of the known places of employment/appearance by the Usurper in chief.
Could be but my search of 1997 Phone Books didn't turn up any others. See: 1997 Phone Book Search for Obamas and Soetoros.
ML/NJ
Considering she filed to run for S.O.S at the local Gay Lesbian Activist chapter, maybe she keeps sending all her “documented evidence” to the Supreme Court of Canada...which would explain why Thomas never sees it.
Or...the Supreme Court has a basketball court...maybe she's sending it there.
JimRob really should give some sort of test which demonstrates a basic understanding of the Constitution and American History before anyone is allowed to post here. It sure would rid us of a lot of ignorant posts.
Article II, Section 1, of the US Constitution states in part:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;The Constitution was adopted by convention of States, September 17, 1787. (Ratification was completed, June 21, 1788.)
Andrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1767. (That's before the adoption of the Constitution for those who have difficulty determining such things.)
As for Wilson's mother, she came to the US at a young age and my guess is that she was naturalized by the time the future President (Thomas!) was born, but I cannot immediately find positive indication that this is true.
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.