Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

She said opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=198465


202 posted on 09/02/2010 2:47:30 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
So now we have from the judiciary that the Obama eligibility issue has been "blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged" excuses to go along with that it would be an "embarrassment" for Congress.



What great legal arguments! /total sarcasm

204 posted on 09/02/2010 2:56:36 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: rolling_stone

No one else is reporting that except WND and they don’t provide a quote or any context. When I see a transcript or a direct quote, I’ll believe it. WND has a history of reporting rumors as fact.


211 posted on 09/02/2010 3:25:40 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson