Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
It seems to me, according to WND's "report," that whatever comment she made about "embarrassment" was in regard to Jensen's argument that the defense had the right to anything and everything.

Jensen had argued that under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant being put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.

Lind, who took 40 minutes to read her decision to the courtroom, disagreed.

She said opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president.

Either way, she didn't appear to say anything about embarrassing Congress, which is what the original tweet said.
217 posted on 09/02/2010 3:56:18 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Accuracy is not a rabid birther trait.


223 posted on 09/02/2010 4:42:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson