Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
My basic problem is that Science has been defined in a self-serving way. Science is the stuff of the physical world. Therefore, it is not God. There is no supernatural component that can be discussed as "real".

Scientists have many areas which really cross the boundaries that they have set up for themselves:

What came before the Big Bang?
As some folks say: In the beginning, there was nothing -- and then it exploded.
Time and Space are the same thing, and if temperatures get too hot, then Time does not exist. Well, what is outside of Time and outside of Space?
Where did Life come from? Some scientists say it came from some other planet. (IOW: "It's turtles all the way down.")
String Theory, Quantum Mechanics, Q-Balls, these are areas where there seem to be no rules or defined expectations. I don't know how you test or prove something like Schroedinger's Cat. It seems like you just can't.

And I say that's fine. In the deep areas of Science, we may need to go outside time and space, and impossible things may be possible. I'm OK saying that this is Science. But that brings us back to the old-fashioned notion that we study the World so that we can see how God works.

But many scientists start gagging at that notion. I believe that the dominant Philosophy of Science in the current age is fundamentally aimed at denying God. In which case it becomes as much a dogmatic atheistic ideology as a field of exploration.

I see the shenanigans they pulled with Global Warming. I see the ridiculous leaps of faith they make in the field of Evolution. I think Science today is in bad shape. They have learned a lot, but they are blind in many ways -- they see only what they want to see.

15 posted on 09/11/2010 7:19:30 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Things will change after the revolution, but not before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Years ago I read something, & I wish I’d written down the quote. It went something like this: The nightmare for scientists is they will struggle over that final mystery of the universe to find theologians already there.

D*mn, I wish I could remember where I read it. Mine is a poor paraphrase.


18 posted on 09/11/2010 8:27:26 AM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
Science has been defined in a USEFUL way. A hypothesis of a supernatural causation is an intellectual dead end that leads nowhere as far as useful prediction and replication of a phenomena.

There originally were no ways to test Relativity. As science advanced, we gained ways to test it, and it came out aces.

It is your blindness that makes you see Science as a denial of God. Most scientists are men of faith. That atheists accept science doesn't make science atheistic. But if you want to see the world through that prism, way to cede to them the most productive means of gaining useful information about the physical world ever devised by man.

21 posted on 09/11/2010 10:38:27 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson