Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

First of all, the GOP candidate is perhaps the most lampooned since Sarah Palin.

Second, the (now very old) polling numbers have driven the drumbeat of "she's way behind".

Perhaps she's not. Perhaps she's gaining.

Just saying.

1 posted on 10/06/2010 5:16:05 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

well, I haven’t seen any polls from SC either. Probably for the same reason.


2 posted on 10/06/2010 5:18:19 AM PDT by heiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Has the O’Donnell campaign done any internal polling of its own?


3 posted on 10/06/2010 5:23:28 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (is a Jim DeMint Republican. You might say he's a funDeMintalist conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Same thing going on in Georgia with the governors race.The rat bastard barnes is throwing everything at Nathan Deal including the kitchen sink but to no avail.The polsters says it tightening but that may be the hype.


5 posted on 10/06/2010 5:34:42 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I woulda thunk "razz-muse-zen" was professional enough to track and report on the "tight" races.

What's up wid dat, Scott??

8 posted on 10/06/2010 5:40:18 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (You can roll a turd in powered sugar; it still ain't a jelly donut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

No polls of New York, either! A dozen pollsters polled within a couple days of the primary... then nobody has conducted a poll since. Since the primary days’ pollsters’ results varied from the Democrats leading by only one, to leading by twenty-six, you’d think someone would want to find out what’s going on, wouldn’t you?

My real suspicion: Most of these new pollsters (Rasmussen, SurveyUSA, Zogby, Research2000) aren’t really basing their results on just their own poll data, but are looking over their shoulders for clues to interpreting their poll data. When they get data from other pollsters, they’re happy to chime in. When that data is lacking, they clam up. It makes it even tougher for them when their unofficial sources go berzerk (Gallup, Siena), silent (Mason-Dixon), or get pressured to produce left-leaning data (PPP, IPSOS, AP, etc.)


10 posted on 10/06/2010 5:46:46 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
rasmutton gets paid to produce a poll except the ones that he runs for his own website promotions.

Maybe no one is paying to see the results in DE.

It's such a small state, rather than take a small sample, you could poll the whole damn state... just kidding, don't get your Delawareian knickers in a knot.

13 posted on 10/06/2010 5:58:57 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Well they had Rachel Maddow in Delaware for last nights show. Why would they go there? They tried to enter O’Donnels campaign center for questions.


14 posted on 10/06/2010 6:04:51 AM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

What is there about the O’Donnell supporters that they see EVERYTHING as a dark conspiracy?

It would seem peculiar to open a thread on Wednesday complaining it’s not Saturday. Saturday isn’t due on Wednesday.

Likewise it’s been less then a month since the last polls were released on Delaware. New polls aren’t quite due yet either.

The last regular Rasmussen release was 9/26/10. The last CNN/Time was 9/17-21/10. The last PPP was 9/11-12/10.

Not that this is likely to stop additional “what are they hiding” threads. Rove and dark forces everywhere, right ?


17 posted on 10/06/2010 6:22:13 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Wonder how her “I am You” ad is playing out in Delaware. It is very different. Sugar sweet and a pleasure to watch - but how will the undecided see it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbtdidHU8vM&feature=player_embedded


20 posted on 10/06/2010 6:41:03 AM PDT by NavyCanDo (What If Glenn Beck is Wright?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I liked the ad. Rush didn’t and others didn’t care for it.

It came off well because of her charm and personality.

Now that she’s gone there, maybe she should put that behind her and concentrate on issues.


21 posted on 10/06/2010 6:48:15 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Actually, there is a new poll out today-bad news for COD. Don’t know how reliable the poll is-hopefully not reliable at all.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/university-of-delaware-poll-coons-leads-odonnell-by-24-points-in-senate-race.php


26 posted on 10/06/2010 8:01:55 AM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Ask and Ye shal recieve:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2602641/posts


30 posted on 10/06/2010 11:11:10 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson