Then you need to have your memory checked, you were always one of the most prolific defenders of Mitt Romney, your name is in many hundreds, if not thousands of posts, sometimes 5 to 7 of your posts stacked on each other, on those threads where the long, detailed, and bitter battles were taking place.
You should know very well how wide ranging, and numerous the flaws of Mitt Romney are, we have sure tried to educate you on them.
Right you are, but Chuck is a wascally wabbit who disguised his Romney defense cleverly throughout with a carefully neutral (but see-through) plausible deniability. So much so that FReeper ejonesie22 coined the term for him ... the Swiss Ninja:
Of course, Charlie actually liked that at the time, IIRC?
I, for one, well remember.
He's unrepentant in my opinion but perhaps is wise enough to not be so vocal about whom he supports/defends.
I don’t know what you THINK we are talking about. The thread is about the Romney File Headers on the threads.
The three things I mention are the three videos I remember seeing in the rotating list of Romney attacks. That is what I am talking about, not the entirety of the arguments of 2007.
Since I wrote that comment, I have seen another video in the playlist, the one about Romneycare. So I had missed that earlier. And there certainly could be more than those 4, that’s the four I’ve noticed, as I said in my previous post.
It is interesting though that in this post, you admit that you clearly remember me defending Romney in many posts (I believe you have greatly exagerated the number, but it was a LOT of posts); which makes even more bizarre your claim that I was hiding my defense of Romney somehow.
Apparently you think I was secretly supporting Romney by brazenly defending him in “thousands of posts”, with “5 to 7 posts stacked on each other”. I guess I was hiding in plain site or something.
My goal then was really not much different than now — to try to get people to focus on the positives for their candidates, rather than simply destroy all other candidates, so that in the end if we manage to get a conservatve nominated, they won’t have been destroyed already like O’Donnell was in Delaware (in that case by liberal/moderates, but the principle is the same).
Too many conservatives like the circular firing squad.