Replies

To: DollyCali

Aren't they all thirty years old now?

2 posted on 11/19/2010 3:28:06 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)

To: Rummyfan

this thread will soon be toast..

one of the pix has an AP signature even though it WAS NOT on the jpg

3 posted on 11/19/2010 3:32:35 AM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is...Tell the storm how big your God is!)

To: Rummyfan

Emma Watson then:

Emma Watson now:

6 posted on 11/19/2010 3:38:08 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)

To: Rummyfan

Actually, they were the right ages when the first movie came out. Emma Watson was born in 1990, Radcliff in 1989 and Grint in 1988.

8 posted on 11/19/2010 3:47:28 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)

To: Rummyfan

Rupert Grint 22, Daniel Radcliffe 21, Emma Watson 20: all playing 18.

Compared to the Dawson casting an American studio would do, that's not out of line.

20 posted on 11/19/2010 7:21:42 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce - Karl Marx)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794