Posted on 01/08/2011 7:22:40 AM PST by yorkie
These people are bankrupt of ideas, knowledge, and integrity.
No No No I talked to an expert (floyd) down at the radar repair shop and he said it was a UFO that hit birds.
“Toxins are available that are so deadly a few drops in a city’s water supply can kill millions.”
A few drops? Such as?
Always be suspicious of stories that begin with “experts suspect”, or experts say or think”.
Glenn Beck did a pretty good job putting the bird kill stories in perspective. He demonstrated with Google searches, that you can pick just about any year and you can find a headline someplace in the World about mysterious bird kills or dead fish washing up.
PSYCHO-FREEP (reference your post # 6)
They are NOT talking about chem-trails here.... did you read the article?
They are talking about Scalar technology which incorporates the transmission of high-energy electromagnetic radiation designed to disrupt geological and biological processes. “It’s a technology that is mostly secret that has been under development since the 1970s……. Scalar technology can be tuned. Patents that have been granted support that capability. This tuning ability permits the electromagnetic frequencies to zero-in on specific biology such as a certain species of bird or fish…or humans too.”
I see I wasn’t too clear.
The High Power, Low Frequency (like HAARP) transmitters MAY have accidentally killed some birds here and there, mostly in the past. IF there was a HPLF transmitter active, it could have killed MAYBE ONE flock of birds by causing mass disorientation.
Ergo, I favor natural causes.
My POINT was that the HAARP like transmitters (especially the big one in Russia), were more likely to have caused long term climate change (or what I call ‘YOUR WEATHER GOT MOVED SOMEWHERE ELSE) and not the animal deaths.
I would agree. Those who live in areas where this is a common occurrence understand it.
Those who don't are easily panicked and misled by the media.
The 'concern' has come from the relatively 'close' incidents, and the fish kills along with bird kills.
Once again, fish kills are common, and often happen to just one species at a time.
YET, we must remain aware, and not take any incidents for granted. Just because no one is using a death ray, or bio-weapons testing on us, or on the animals, doesn't mean they eventually won't.
To be exact, it could have been caused by the SUDDEN CHANGE in weather.
Also the blackbirds look like chickens and the people look Asian. This is most likely a stock photo of the bird flu clean up in China.
Also the blackbirds look like chickens and the people look Asian. This is most likely a stock photo of the bird flu clean up in China.
I agree. I am sure there would be some correlation.
If you laid a map of the High Power/Low Frequency sites like HAARP over the bird/fish kills, there would be some correlation (even though you can't determine if any of the HPLF antennas were powered up).
If you laid a map of earthquakes over the bird/fish kills, you would probably get some correlation.
The unspoken assumption would be that HAARP modified the jet stream, and that HAARP somehow caused the deaths of these birds or what have you.
Well, let's clear that up. HAARP, when in use years ago, did artificially alter the path of the Jet Stream. Since the Jet Stream changes anyway, it's really nothing new. How that artificial alteration has effected the climate on a long term basis is hard to determine, given that we don't know exactly what it would have done had we not 'interfered'.
Since it is a matter of historical record that not only birds have fallen in large groups from the sky, but also fish,and frogs, it seems likely that whatever did that could suck up a flock of birds, cause their insides to rupture (sudden change in pressure), and freeze them, then expel them from the top of the wind column, where they plummet to the ground many miles away and hours later.
If so, then there is something to continue researching, but it still doesn’t prove anything.
I'm not trying to prove anything. I'm trying to lay out all the options and see what can be eliminated, or what looks probable.
Maybe we punch more 'holes' in the atmosphere that we realize, and the unfiltered dangerous rays from the Sun cause weather changes and animal kills.
My real issue with the article is who are these so called 'experts' that 'suspect' the military caused this?
These days, anyone with a keyboard and Internet access claims to be an 'expert'.
I have no clue what really killed these birds, or the fish. What do you think caused it?
I don’t really know what I think caused these animals to be killed.
At one point, I was suspicious about the species of birds affected, being rather similar to those affected by West Nile, but that doesn’t explain a simultaneous die-off or nearly so, to my knowledge. Neither would it explain simultaneous die-offs in cold weather, unless some viral illness was being transmitted via insects other than the mosquito. Not entirely unheard of, but there are still problems,
I’ve also wondered if this wasn’t an effect similar to the seeming rash of shark sightings and attacks that happen every couple of years, which is really more of a heightened awareness than anything specific, a media sensation.
It’s a peculiar situation, and I’m not jumping on any bandwagons one way or the other, pro or con. If someone wants to speculate in the direction of some exotic form of weaponry or even an unintentional effect of some little-known scientific experimentation, there is some history in that regard as well, and I wouldn’t rule it out.
There is enough information on hand, to begin to either support or refute some of the various speculations, some of which would appear to be pretty wild, is all I was hoping to point out.
I want to thank you for your cognisant and applicable posts on this article today. You make sense - and you make it very clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.