Posted on 02/24/2011 4:22:11 PM PST by blade_tenner
By what criteria would the unborn be citizens?
That one of the reasons our Constitution was established was to secure the blessings of liberty to our offspring does not establish the citizenship of the unborn - it gives one of the reasons our government was established.
The unborn do not have to be legally defined as citizens (and they are not) to have rights that should be (but are not) respected under our Constitution.
This has been gone over previously.
Erroneously covered before and again now imho.
To be a citizen under U.S. law and the Constitution one must be born or naturalized.
If you know of a legal argument whereby the unborn are citizens then say so.
Otherwise any argument based upon the citizenship of the unborn is erroneous.
They are persons - in my view of the law - and not to be deprived of life without due process of law. And, as you point out, the Constitution was established to ensure liberty to ourselves and our posterity - but that doesn't establish citizenship of the unborn. That is a different argument - a facile one.
Thanks. I did not see that till after I had posted.
I never read through the thread before posting either.
It takes too long.
As I read the first sentence, it completely contradicts the title. But that is probably just me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.