[Whitebread]

Gingrich is the only one who would eviscerate "the one" in a debate.

He could remind U.S. of his experience as a balancer of the federal budget, a shrinker of the welfare rolls, a reducer of the unemployment, He is a national leader who has already accomplished these things, etc. Clinton proved that your personal sex life is irrelevant.

[aruanan]

He could remind U.S. of his experience as a balancer of the federal budget, a shrinker of the welfare rolls, a reducer of the unemployment, He is a national leader who has already accomplished these things, etc. Clinton proved that your personal sex life is irrelevant.

Irrelevant only to Clinton's supporters. And Gingrich showed a degree of faithlessness that is emblematic and turns everything else he has said and done to ashes.

[unseen1]

no he couldn’t. Every point Newt makes Obama can simply turn to him and say Newt you advocated the same position as I am....

[vox_freedom]

Clinton proved that your personal sex life is irrelevant.

Oh, really?
Did BJ Clinton also "prove" that lying under oath is also acceptable and not relevant?
Pray-tell, what other pearls of wisdom do you have for us?

[Mr. Silverback]

You haven’t been paying attention. Your sex life is only irrelevant if you’re a Democrat.

Plus, while no one is perfect, it’s foolish to believe a serial adulterer can be trustworthy. If conservatives accept a nominee that has that history, we’re asking for another Nixon...or even worse, Nixon with his pants around his ankles.