We know now how open and enlightened and unbiased the scientific community/academia has been with respect to the global warming issue. They NEVER put anyone into Coventry or badmouth people who come up with hypotheses that differ from their conventional shared wisdom.
I have read some things from unbiased sources that make me think that our people ought to give the cold fusion technology a real shot. I think there might be something to it.
Two decades have now passed since the initial "results". By now, if there was anything there, I would expect that we would have something called "the cold fusion effect".
This would be a REPRODUCIBLE experiment that would CLEARLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY indicate that some physical process was taking place which cannot be explained by anything other than cold fusion.
Virtually every great discovery in science has been preceded by experiments whose results could not be explained, followed by theories which suggest experiments which could support or falsify the theory.
Is there a "cold fusion effect"? Not that I am aware of.
Is there a falsifiable theory of cold fusion? Not that I am aware of.
Perhaps you can educate me. I was greatly interested when this topic first surfaced. I have seen nothing to renew that interest in twenty years.