>>> The problem is no one has any evidence of illegitimacy
Not true.
It is an undisputed fact that he was not born to parentS who were US citizens.
His father is not a US citizen.
His mother was not of legal age to transmit citizenship.
Also... the burden of proof is upon Obama. NOT those challenging his credentials.
It is an undisputed fact that he was not born to parentS who were US citizens. His father is not a US citizen.
Agreed. You and I know that, all of the former judges and lawyers sitting in Congress know that, the USSC knows that and yet it wasn’t/isn’t an issue. Why is that?
Apparently because they all agree the USSC has not yet provided a clear opinion on whether the term NBC requires two citizen parents.
If you and I do not like that, it appears we have to get it before the USSC. The quickest way is for us to insist that the House, or one of its committees applys to the court for an opinion. Which it ought to do at the same time it subpoenas HI for birth documents.
Until then, what is the basis for saying the fact his father was not a citizen is evidence of illegitimacy?
His mother was not of legal age to transmit citizenship.
Not relevant if he was born in HI. Only until you have evidence he was born outside the U.S., does it become very relevant.
Also... the burden of proof is upon Obama. NOT those challenging his credentials.
O has satisfied that burden each and every time he was asked. He or his agent signed off at the state level. The Congress did not require that he provide proof at its Joint Session, so he had no burden to satisfy.
As a matter of fact, there does not appear to be any Constitutional authority for anyone to now ask him after the fact. Recall the Georgia politician who screwed up the courage to ask, pretty sure he got blown off. Impeachment, conviction and removal appears the only remedy.
Hope this makes sense for you.