Posted on 04/13/2011 4:46:04 PM PDT by B4Ranch
The Keystone of the Islamic Milieu: Inbreeding
The darkest hour is just before dawn. A huge swath of this planet, from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Philippine Sea, has been held in a synthetic, forced nightfall for nearly fourteen centuries. But the sunrise is coming, it is coming sooner rather than later, and this light will be the life of men.
Everywhere in the western world, people look at the savage violence that is a daily occurrence in the Muslim world and shake their heads in stunned disbelief. A pastor of a very small Christian flock in Florida burns a Koran. Weeks later at literally the global antipode, Muslim imams drive through neighborhoods in a vehicle with loudspeakers attached, calling the townsfolk to riot. The townsfolk respond, and before it is all over, at least 22 innocent people are dead at the hands of these townsfolk, with at least two of them beheaded. How is this possible? How can this be? How can human behavior and culture be so monstrously different? Is this difference attributable to nothing more than environmental nurture theory?
No. There is something else. There is a catalyst -- absent in every other culture on earth -- that has poisoned the cultural soil, thus yielding the fruit of bad harvest for nearly 1,400 years. That catalyst is inbreeding. As a direct result, the Muslim population is mentally developmentally disabled on a mass scale.
All human cultures display strict prohibitions against inbreeding and consanguineous marriage. Incest is a universal taboo. This is a transcendent anthropological fact. As a Roman Catholic, I attribute this to what is called "The Natural Law." Every human person without exception is created by God with a deep, innate knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong. Stabbing someone in the neck for no reason whatsoever is just as wrong here in Lone Tree, Colorado as it is in the Amazon basin, as it is on the high plateaus of Mongolia.
But there is one culture, one faux "religion," that expressly condones and encourages consanguineous marriage and breeding. That system is Islam, and the document that explicitly ratifies incest is the Koran, specifically Sura 4 verse 23:
Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated the marriage -- if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time -- but do not break up existing marriages.
Sounds like an exhaustive list -- but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed. In the Muslim culture, marriage and breeding between first cousins has existed since day one. Mohammed himself married Zaynab, who was his father's sister's daughter. Mohammed and Zaynab were direct first cousins.
Marrying your first cousin is the genetic equivalent of marrying your half-sibling. Think of your own family. Let's say your dad has a sister, who is "Aunt Linda" to you. Your dad and Aunt Linda, being full siblings, have exactly the same genetic constitution. Their family trees prior to their generation are identical. Therefore, if Aunt Linda has any children, who are your first cousins, they are, in genetic terms, 50% identical to you. You share one of your two genetic constituencies with your cousins, thus making them genetically the same as a half-sibling would be.
First cousin marriage for just one generation is extremely risky in and of itself. This is why virtually every other culture on earth prohibits it, and treats it as a cultural taboo. When two people come together who carry so many similar genetic alleles, the chance of an undesirable recessive trait expressing itself in their offspring soars. Now, understanding that single-generational risk, understand that Muslims have been marrying their first cousins over and over again for 1,400 years. Sit in stillness for a moment with the full, terrifying gravity of this.
The Reproductive Health Journal reports the following rates on consanguinity in Muslim countries. Where a statistical range has been recorded, I have used the lower parameter:
Algeria: 22.6%, Bahrain: 39.4%, Egypt (North): 20.9%, Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%, Iraq: 47.0%, Jordan: 28.5%, Kuwait: 22.5%, Lebanon: 12.8%, Libya: 48.4%, Mauritania: 47.2%, Morocco: 19.9%, Oman: 56.3%, Palestine: 17.5%, Qatar: 54.0%, Saudi Arabia: 42.1%, Sudan: 44.2%, Syria: 30.3%, Tunisia: 20.1%, United Arab Emirates: 40.0% Yemen: 40.0%
Muslim men are never, ever allowed to be around, see, converse with or otherwise interact with any females outside of their families. However, they are permitted to act as chaperones for their female first cousins. If your first cousin is the only person of the opposite sex you ever get to interact with, is it any surprise that Muslims are marrying their first cousins more as the rule than as the exception?
According to the BBC, 55% of Pakistani-Britons are married to a first cousin, and as a corollary to that produce "just under a third" of all children in the UK with genetic illnesses, despite being only 3% of the total births.
As a direct result of inbreeding, the Muslim population is the only population on earth that is mentally and physically devolving. This inherent weakness makes Muslim populations more susceptible to nefarious, oppressive leadership and mass manipulation. The amount of objective evidence supporting this statement is colossal and obvious.
But there is hope. All is not lost. In my education in animal husbandry, I was keenly interested in my genetics classes. One of the key concepts in farm animal genetics is "hybrid vigor." This is the genetic principle which states that the crossbreeding of two genetically diverse plants or animals of the same species yields offspring of increased vigor and other superior qualities. All plants and animals have been designed to "bring out the best in themselves," and our DNA has built-in fail-safes to edit and correct any flaws which creep into our DNA over time. Given this, if the people now living under the fist of Islam are finally freed and can court and love and marry whomever they choose, thus reopening the genetic pool, this will allow hybrid vigor to cleanse and restore to full health their populations.
". . . et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt."
Ann Barnhardt is a livestock and grain commodity broker and marketing consultant, American patriot, traditional Catholic, and unwitting counter-revolutionary blogger. She can be reached through her business at www.barnhardt.biz.
Who said muslim uncles don’t marry nieces? They sure do.
“. . . et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt.”
and light shineth in the darkness and the darkness did not comprehend it”.
only after they rape them!!!
And you can shut up now, Ann.
Since our military and political "leaders" lack the balls to wipe them out, let them do it, do it, do it to themselves.
That's why Islam is the perfect religion for controlling this type of people. They are continually told that they are the way they are because "Allah wills it", and they shouldn't question or try to change their situation. It's a very fatalistic belief system.
What? Not bestiality?
Sounds like the muzzie version of Idiocracy.
Only trouble is ...libs are even more stupid.
All very well, but there are no signs whatever that Muslims are about to abandon this practice.
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” Isaac Asimov
The self-professed Catholic author does not know the Bible too well. First-cousins are not listed in God’s prohibited list. Read Leviticus 18 for details.
First cousins may not be prohibited in Leviticus, but they are prohibited to Catholics by Church law.
Where does she say muslim uncles don’t marry nieces?
I don’t get it, why would you want to hook up with your cousin when your goat is better lookin’? But that explains 0bama’s ears and lack of logic.
But here is the critique from the article:
“Sounds like an exhaustive list — but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed.”
That statement could be used by Muslims against the Bible as easily as the author can against the Koran.
Further, first cousins can still legally marry in many states here in the USA, and such a marriage is recognized by all 50 states.
Our culture does not encourage this, but it is allowed. The author here does not make a case that Muslims encourage incest based on a quote from the Koran.
There are much better arguments against Islam. This one is like saying Muslims are bad because they are not good Catholics.
Many Catholics do not follow the “Church law” either. Are they better than Muslims who don’t even claim to follow such teachings?
But here is the critique from the article:
“Sounds like an exhaustive list — but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed.”
That statement could be used by Muslims against the Bible as easily as the author can against the Koran.
Further, first cousins can still legally marry in many states here in the USA, and such a marriage is recognized by all 50 states.
Our culture does not encourage this, but it is allowed. The author here does not make a case that Muslims encourage incest based on a quote from the Koran.
There are much better arguments against Islam. This one is like saying Muslims are bad because they are not good Catholics.
Many Catholics do not follow the “Church law” either. Are they better than Muslims who don’t even claim to follow such teachings?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.