Clearly, you believe the long form is a forgery and you seem to have done at least some research to support that conclusion. Have you also researched the evidence that disputes the forgery claims? Are you relying on the “layers” as evidence of a forgery?
Layers might not be evidence of forgery, but multiple pixelations (image resolutions) certainly are. Here is a blowup of the signatures of Dunham and Sinclair:
It is obvious that the signatures are not from the same scan. The document is a composite and therefore a FRAUD.
ML/NJ
I’ve looked at the evidence presented by several, but mostly by the one who posts on YouTube under the name of orangegold1. He debunks all the theories regarding OCR etc etc that is involved with layering.
IF you haven’t seen this, I would recommend that you do. I for one, had thought this whole thing was behind us, but it’s not. The document has been altered and you can see the layering easily with the adobe illustrator software.
If I’m wrong point me to where I am wrong, but please look at the postings by orangegold1.
Also, I understand that people from all over the country are sending him Hawaii long form birth certificates. He’s being challenged daily on this, from people like you who are still skeptical, and so far he’s been able to offer logical responses.
We knew that the COLB was a phony, so it is no surprise that the long form is. We were told by Abercrombie that it didn’t exist, not it does.
The man waits months to produce it, and then and only after Trump makes him do so, and before the Corsi book comes out.
The ball is in Obama’s court to explain, not in my court.
You are clearly not serious.
4/22/11 The pResident issues a letter to HDOH to request TWO COPIES of his LFBC and authorizes Perkins & Coie to fetch them
4/25/11 Ms. Judith Corley of P&C flies to Hawaii to pick up TWO PIECES OF PAPER, not a PDF file!
4/26/11 BHO waves the pieces of paper for all to see.
So tell us Buckley how we ended up with a multi-layered electronic file posted on the WH website?
