[Let_It_Be_So]

...Yet, the scientists who described the alleged impact in a hallowed U.S. scientific journal refuse to consider the critics’ evidence — insisting they are correct, even though no one can replicate their work: the hallmark of credibility in the scientific world...

 

...“It does feed distrust in science,” says Wallace Broecker, a geochemist at Columbia University and an international dean of climate research. “Those who don’t believe in human-produced global warming grab onto it.”...

 

Amazing intellectual disconnect, aka cognitive dissonance.

[SunkenCiv]

Yes, exactly — this theory was and still is rejected was the global warming cult, but none of them belong in the sciences.

[Bernard Marx]

Amazing intellectual disconnect, aka cognitive dissonance.

Two different worlds! There's an enormous amount of evidence-gathering, research and non-ideological peer review to be done before any conclusions can be drawn about this.