Posted on 06/18/2011 12:54:51 PM PDT by editor-surveyor
Election year is just 6 months away and Sarah Palin is working the crowd…sort of. Her latest bus tour has a lot of people wondering what she’s up to. In an effort to not have the media follow her around; Palin has opted to not disclose where she’s going next until she’s there. It’s an interesting, albeit confusing, tactic and has a lot of people wondering what she’s planning.
Some are speculating that Palin is setting the stage for a Presidential or Vice Presidential bid in the 2012 elections. Others are just plain confused at why her bus tour is veiled in such mystery. Whatever’s going on – it has Sarah Palin on the minds of the public and in media again which may be exactly where she wants to be.
What do you think? Should Sarah Palin make a run for the White House again or is it time for her to bow out and allow her fellow Republicans to focus their efforts and funding on other candidates? Should Sarah Palin run for office in 2012?
(Excerpt) Read more at qwanz.com ...
Gonna cling to your PDS no matter what, eh? I suppose you'll still be putting Sarah down, when as president, she's busy reversing all of Obama's damage.
Hate on.
>> “That’s like saying that Pearl Harbor was a wake up call to the Japanese” <<
.
A bizzare attempt at an alalogy!
No wonder you’re so confused.
37% No, Sarah Palin should not run for office in 2012.
1% I don't know.
No, that wasn’t her point. It may be your point as you attempt to rewrite the question and answer it for her, but it was not her point when she made it. To go way back to my original point, she misspoke, so what, everybody does. She shouldn’t have tried to come up with a lame roundabout explanation to try to show that she really was in some small way correct, nor should she have blamed it on another gotcha media question (”what have you seen today and what are you going to take away from your visit”).
Don't mind if I do.
>> “This wee feud between Palin and Bachmann supporters is asinine. The ladies are political clones” <<
That is a lie and an insult to Palin and most Freepers.
Palin is a competent, honest, and experienced leader, that has established her presence in this election above any other candidate. Bachmann is a minor player that was snookered into thinking she could actually run for president by the MSM, and the GOP elite, both of whom wished only to use her to deflect the genuine candidacy of Sarah Palin.
At one point I believed that Bachmann would be useful in congress, but now it is apparent that she is a sellout and cannot be depended upon.
It takes information beyond the WWW to say what she said. She was correct, take it or leave it.
Don't mind if I do.
Go for it. You won't be the first PDSer to bite on the zot.
So, she was correct, but out of the trillions of websites, online documents, etc., that are right now available at your fingertips, you can’t prove what you hold so fervently to. Wow, quite an admission.
Sorry but cjeck out some Palin threads...there are 100’s of posts that prove the point.
Don’t judge to harshly. She is just getting started and the spin machine starts early. I like all of the candidates right now. By this time next year, I will like maybe 2.
If I get a zot for speaking my mind and expressing my dislike for Palin, then this forum isn’t what it claims to be.
The internet was not my school. Heck, if you want a real historian to answer it just ask Newt.
Please. You’re really not referencing an internet poll to support your position that she should run are you? What about the recent gallup poll that says 64% won’t vote for her? Oh never mind I know...Gallup’s in obama’s pocket and he’s so afraid of Palin that he’s paying for phony polls.
Relax, you have a valid argument against a why there isn’t 57 states.
So you learned in school that Paul Revere’s mission was to do something other than warn the patriots/minutemen that the British were on the move? What school was that?
You’re a moron. The media didn’t make the point that Palin stated x was Revere’s mission. They were ignorant that it happened....and in fact it did happen.
Wrong question. I wouldn't mind seeing her a President at all! If by some miracle she's the nominee I'll vote for her. But I don't think she'll ever win. Her problem is that she has nearly 100% name recognition already. Very few people don't know who she is and most people have already made up their minds about her and she's only got about 35-40% support. She would get NO democrat votes and verry feew independents. I don't see her winning. Period.
Bachmann has willfully allowed herself to be used toward the attack on another candidate , and that candidate has been nothing but supportive of Bachmann.
That is a huge moral failure that requires confession and repentance. She has done neither. She will not last long.
Damn you’re stupid.
Your grasp of history is nothing but a poem?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.