Posted on 06/25/2011 3:32:19 PM PDT by CreviceTool
Charlevoix, Michigan (Indianas NewsCenter) Officials with the FAA have confirmed that a single-engine plane that took off from Smith Field Airport in Fort Wayne crashed into a residential garage in Charlevoix, Michigan at about 7:30pm Friday Night. They say two people on board were killed and another person was critically injured. Sources close to the family tell us that Dr. Stephen Hatch and his wife Kim were the people killed in the crash. They tell us that Hatchs son, Austin, was also in the aircraft and is in critical condition.
(Excerpt) Read more at indianasnewscenter.com ...
At least they didn't say that the utility pole hit the plane...:^)
I wonder if the plane was a Cirrus - the new “doctor-killer” Bonanza.
It hasn't made the FAA Preliminary Accident/Incident List yet...
http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/preliminary_data/
Is this a John Denver quote? John’s failure to have the aircraft refueled as causal factors in the accident.
Its a shame that people have the freedom to choose their mode of travel. such a shame /s
“Its a shame that people have the freedom to choose their mode of travel. such a shame /s”
It’s also understood that people have the freedom to choose their demise as well....
May I appropriate that phrase for my own for-profit use?
Cheers!
Yep. Prayers up for the kid. I’d bet he has some rough road ahead.
It reads stupid, but makes sense because there’s a huge difference between a “forced landing” and a “crash”. It was hitting the utility pole that probably turned the forced landing into a crash.
I, and a lot of other aviation enthusiasts, were p*ssed week before last when the loss of the B-17 “Liberty Belle” was called a “crash”. In reality the plane’s crew executed an incredible, textbook forced landing in a field (1 minute 40 seconds from observing the problem to the aircraft on the ground, stopped with brakes set). That the plne was lost was due to the unavailability of fire equipment, it wasn’t a “crash”
I was just parsing the wording of the sentence, I guess.
The pilot crashed the plane into a utility pole while attempting to make a forced landing.
The utility pole did not “contribute” to the crash, it was just standing there minding it’s own business.
I saw a sign in a Airbase that said:There is no reason to fly into a thunderstorm in peacetime.
A pilot told me that there is standing orders to that effect. I saw a picture of a USAF gulfstream that flew into a storm and the nose looked like a golfball. The hail must have been very large.
I wonder if the plane was a Cirrus - the new doctor-killer Bonanza.
It hasn't made the FAA Preliminary Accident/Incident List yet...
http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/preliminary_data/
It's now in the data base
http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/preliminary_data/media/B_0627_Y.txt
The plane wasn't a new Cirrus, but was a 1975 “doctor killer” Bonanza.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.