The second problem, I am sure you picked up on, is that it has nothing to do with your invocation of the ability to manipulate weak interactions, and for that theory I believe you are quite on your own and free to publish without having to worry overly much about priority.
We note a very important fact that both Rb and R do not depend on the Gamow factor in contrast to the conventional theory for nuclei fusion in free space. This is consistent with the conjecture noted by Dirac [16] and used by Bogolubov [21] that boson creation and annihilation operators can be treated simply as numbers when the ground state occupation number is large. This implies that for large N each charged boson behaves as an independent particle in a common average background potential and the Coulomb interaction between two charged bosons is suppressed. Quoting Kim et. al. 2003
This is a neat bit of circular reasoning. He assumes that the "bosons" are non-interacting and then concludes that their is no coulomb interaction between them, thus suppressing the Gamov factor in the fusion cross-section, which factor is the whole reason why cold-fusion cannot work. IOW this paper simply assumes away the coulomb barrier that makes cold-fusion impossible.
But of course you realized all of that when you read these papers, leading you to propose your weak-interaction manipulation method instead.
They were amazed when he demonstrated that electricity and lightning were the same ~ and all with a single demonstration.
He knew they were the same all along ~ because he was smart, and he made substantial use of that quantum quality we discussed yesterday where you only need to know half of everything to be able to trick everybody every time!
Now, about this guy with the Doctorate who has his paper out there being looked at by all and sundry, did you send him some comments?
Regarding manipulating the weak force, to do that effectively don't you simply have to turn an up-quark into a down-quark?
So, he makes mistakes? He's got a team of young whipper snappers there who could find them all ~ 200 papers "read"!
Go ahead; challenge him.