I think that you miss the point of this guy’s little scenario. He may be an amateur. He may have an overinflated sense of his military prowess. But whatever the case, guys like him only have to get lucky once as far you and I are concerned.
When things become unpleasant, there’ll be a bunch of losers just like him out in the field, looking for what they can can get. And some of them will have had recent military training. As I said, they only have to get lucky once.
So I’m not laughing. And neither should you.
I’m still laughing. ...won’t even be able see “marauders” with a telescope from here. And let’s see...disasters...
* Hurricanes: uncheck
* Tsunamis: nope
* Nukes: nope—several hundred miles downwind from the nearest possible targets.
* Economy: too far, traffic, likely checkpoints, too cold most of the year, surface water sources too far apart, too windy, possible targets of robbers too far and few between. No fuel. Too many dangerous animal predators for long-distance, hiking couch potatoes (including athletes who can’t run far at high altitudes). Hundreds of thousands of much fatter targets much closer to the cities.
I saw the foolishness of bipartisan political and business directions a long time ago: global dirty deals with foreign communists for manufacturing and slavery, anti-family policies, reluctance to properly defend the USA, all (shoulda done the source: Iran). They made their bed. They’ll lay in it.