Please explain why someone would have and use the social security number from a deceased person if identity fraud is not involved? Use of this number associated with the individual in question only begins appearing in 1986 (putting the forged and back dated Selective Service Registration aside). And identity fraud goes right back to the alleged Hawaiian birth certificate.
The obots claim a clerical error was committed. Really?However, SSN’s cannot be recycled.
Obot logic is failed.
Can obot and logic really be used in the same sentence?
Can obot and logic really be used in the same sentence?
Can obot and logic really be used in the same sentence?