Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm very surprised that this article wasn't posted already! But of course, it's stuff we FReepers already know.
1 posted on 09/06/2011 11:41:55 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Only land owners should be allowed to vote.


2 posted on 09/06/2011 11:43:29 AM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Every American citizen has the right to vote.


3 posted on 09/06/2011 11:43:52 AM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Alzheimer patients get to sign up...Sick....but you know it is happening.


4 posted on 09/06/2011 11:44:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

One should only be able to vote where one pays taxes.

If you don’t pay Fed taxes then you should be barred from voting in Federal elections.

If you don’t pay taxes in the state , you must not be allowed to vote in that state.


5 posted on 09/06/2011 11:45:36 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Obama is bad luck for the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

If the poor can’t vote, then I’m out.
If only land owners can vote, I’m out.

I’m DAMN sure not a Democrat, and I DAMN sure for conservatives. Why take my vote out? Yes, I understand the reason, but c’mon!


7 posted on 09/06/2011 11:48:47 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers”~Sarah Louise Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
The time is long since past, to reverse the trend towards always extending the suffrage, to reevaluating the whole question. Under the Constitution, the requirements for suffrage were left to the States--even as to suffrage in Federal elections--with the Federal suffrage being determined in each State, by that State's standards for its most popular House of the State Legislature (Art. I, Sec. 2, United States Constitution.) But the politicians, have long since abandoned that wise provision in favor of jockying for advantage by extending the suffrage, by Constitutional Amendments, that override whatever the social values of the individual States provided.

Yet the clear conflict of interest, over Federal entitlements, makes it mandatory that we reexamine this, before the worst prophesies of our future come home to roost. (See Universal Suffrage--Threat To Freedom.) The present debt crisis is directly attributable to allowing people to elect parasites who will feather their respective nests, rather than serve the intended Constitutional purpose of providing an economic environment that brings out the best, rather than the absolute worst, in the individual citizen.

If you receive an unearned benefit from the Federal Government, there ought to be an appropriate cut-off of voting rights for a period comparable to that in which your conflict of interest is apparent, plus two years--or some such..

William Flax

11 posted on 09/06/2011 11:59:10 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Stupid article...oh my God the poor get to vote!

Ring wing organizations should be registering the poor too, duh!


25 posted on 09/06/2011 12:28:32 PM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

http://www.businessinsider.com/houses-for-1-dollar-2010-12


26 posted on 09/06/2011 12:30:02 PM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

20+ million illegal aliens are in effect prospective democrats..
Anyone for amnesty or anything like amnesty is FOR more democrats..

i.e. Perry, Romney, Juan McLame.. (BUSH{all of them})


27 posted on 09/06/2011 12:33:14 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

I don’t mind non-tax-paying non-land-owning people voting, what I do mind is them voting themselves money not just out of the treasury but out of the national credit card _and_ voting to raise the credit limit. THIS IS INSANE.


30 posted on 09/06/2011 12:46:11 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

it isn’t un-american but it may be anti-american. the democrat party is not un-american but it is anti-american. OTOH the CBC is un-american, anti-american, and recist.


34 posted on 09/06/2011 1:11:04 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Read this thread entirely.

We may defeat Obama in 2012, but we are screwed unless something changes. Obamama is a problem, but not the problem. The problem is the lowest common denominator electorate that elected a Marxist rabble rouser with no governing/business experience.

The democrats can always import illegal voters at a faster rate than we can create working, responsible citizens. They have the demographics on their side.

Unless those non-working citizens who receive govt. free money are denied the vote, they will vote for whomever buys their vote.


36 posted on 09/06/2011 1:26:01 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

We need to absolutely verify if voters are citizens and eligible to vote. Obviously there are too many locales and election offices (sanctuary cities) that believe citizenship is irrelevant to rights.

Additionally I don’t trust politicians of EITHER party. Both will, given the opportunity, attempt to circumvent our election system, especially now that we have hackable voting machines with out an audit trail. Once either Party thinks they have the ability to usurp the people’s vote, God help us.

We need a third and fourth Party to keep the other two honest. That’s why purchasing agents always want and need at least 3 vendors to prevent collusion.

A paper ballot that has no ambiguity and that can be counted and recounted and stored for posterity is a better option. Forget the need to get an immediate result for the media. We can use an absentee ballot but they are only counted when the electronic voting outcome is very close. Only if we all used absentee ballots would it make a difference.


46 posted on 09/07/2011 6:56:37 AM PDT by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson