Posted on 09/11/2011 6:01:32 PM PDT by Steelfish
September 6, 2006 The Smear Campaign Against ABC's 'The Path to 9/11' By Noel Sheppard
As the fifth anniversary of the attacks on 9/11 approaches, Americans are once again facing the horrors surrounding this event, and the ominous portent it conveyed. Yet, for some reason, one group of citizens has chosen to commemorate this solemn occasion by protesting an ABC miniseries documenting the history of this calamity.
As amazing as it might seem, the top brass in the liberal blogosphere's 'Netroots' have been frantically writing the past couple of days about 'The Path to 9/11,' declaring to their readers that this docudrama is 'a piece of fiction,' and that ABC's airing it represents 'gross negligence.'
At the heart of the controversy is the belief universally shared by these Michael Moore devotees that the ABC program in question doesn't paint a very pretty picture of their Hero—in—Chief, William Jefferson Clinton.
Yet, it appears that none of the disgruntled commentators has actually seen the miniseries — a fact that some hypocritically suggest represents a part of the conspiracy — and, therefore, are coming to conclusions about the program's contents from reviews by others.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Clinton did nothing about the attacks while he was president.
The Path to 9/11 is probably accurate ... and I still won’t blame an American President.
That it was theoretically preventable is not the worst part of 9/11. Once underestimating a threat is forgivable. The real tragedy would be underestimating the threat twice.
SnakeDoc
MSNBC is airing something right now about the lead up to 911. Looked like it was going to be a Bush bash so I stopped watching. Maybe it blames Clinton later in the show. I was watching the BO’s and the Bush’s together for a portion of this morning on C-Span. They were not talking at all. I don’t know how Bush can stand being within 1 foot of him and his associations with Rev Wright.
Let’s just not blame(correctly) Clinton let’s blame the ENTIRE LOUSY Washington Federal ESTABLISHMENT(current one too)! G*D I HATE these people!
Bump for tomorrow.
Clinton consistantly ignored the warning signs. Play the clock out if you will. 9/11 happened on GW Bush’s watch, 9 months after assuming office. Clinton had been president for 8 years and allowed the situation to fester, but Mr. Bush got the blame. And the Party’s media was all upset that clinton wasn’t president when it happened. Really makes you wonder just what clinton what have done to us if he had been president. His media was all upset about the fact that clinton wasn’t president when it happened. Wonder why?
Why do you think they targeted Curt Weldon (PA-7) and the Able-Danger Hearings he led in the House?
“Apparently, intel agencies doing their job and sharing info is a bigger problem to Gorlick than potential terrorist attacks.
Why do you think they targeted Curt Weldon (PA-7) and the Able-Danger Hearings he led in the House?”
Exactly! Like Ken Starr impeaching Clinton, the traitors in the U.S. Government turned it around into an attack on Weldon. The same thing happened to Senator Joseph McCarthy. The Communists he attacked counterattacked (with the government’s approval) and destroyed Joe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.