Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays with a "main partner" have concurrent casual sexual relationships
mygenes.co.nz ^ | 09/14/2011 | N.E.Whitehead

Posted on 09/14/2011 7:45:37 PM PDT by massmike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: massmike
>>> homosexual agenda ping

This is reaching. Like it's a news bulletin men screw around, gay or straight. geez


21 posted on 09/14/2011 8:24:48 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Somehow seems appropriate that bisexuals would have 2.5 partners, instead of 2.0 or 3.0.


22 posted on 09/14/2011 8:26:02 PM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The “stereotype” is that gay males have hundreds of male sex partners in their lifetime; that is, if they don’t die fron AIDS first. The “stereotype” is also that AIDS is contracted as a result of having sex with hundreds of male partners. The fact is, many stereotypes are true, at least to a large extent, or they wouldn’t exist in the first place. Many gay men openly brag about their numerous sexual conquests and related STD’s, so unless they are lying, they fit right into the “stereotype” of the typical gay male.


23 posted on 09/14/2011 8:28:03 PM PDT by decisis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keats5
Yeah....love it!!

I just turned in you!!!

24 posted on 09/14/2011 8:28:11 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/189


25 posted on 09/14/2011 8:29:02 PM PDT by massmike (Massachusetts:Stopped hanging witches;started electing Kennedys.Coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

In my opinion, to truely understand this issue you have to look at sexuality as a whole. The left-wing continually argue that you have to look at issues of sexuality as if their are hard-wired sets of people. Left-wingers do not want to even allow the suggestion that other forms of sexual corruption are more aligned with homosexual behavior.

The fact is that homosexuality is a corruption of natural human sexuality. In any honest study of those who engage in homosexual behavior you will find a very large overlap with all other forms of sexual corruption. Very sickening behaviors that are so disgusting that if more people were made aware the popularity of homsexuality would greatly diminish.

But of course the left-wing will try to point out any and all corrupt behavior among people who are engaged in heterosexual behavior in order to whitewash the sickening behavior of the so-called homosexual community.

The corruption though among people that can be considered heterosexual is also the result of the left-wing sexual revolution. Since the counter-culture the left-wing has promoted heavily the acceptance of corrupt behavior in regards to sexual behavior in society.

No one is perfect and sexual corruption may never be eliminated but it is the left-wing that promotes it and not conservatives. They must be held accountable for the culture they promote.

There are two means that are needed to defend this nation from a massive attack on our freedom. (By attacking the morality of society the left-wing is attacking our freedom)

1.) We must stand up to the attack on our ‘right’ to representation in regards to all issues of public decency.

The left-wing believe that perversion is a sacred right. Libertarians agree with them. They want to push the lie that laws that deter perverse sexual expression in public are un-American. In reality though, homosexual marraige and laws protecting the open expression of perversion in public are un-American and need to be fought against strongly.

2.) There needs to be a new conservative cultural revolution in America.

Traditional morality must be made to be popular again. We can not let the leftists shame those who are moral and we must instead make those who promote perversion be the ones who are shamed. Our children deserve this.


26 posted on 09/14/2011 8:41:09 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Ya think?


27 posted on 09/15/2011 2:25:00 AM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Even "responsible" homos will opine that men in a "committed," "monogamous" same-sex relationship should wear a condom. Why?

Very revealing.

28 posted on 09/15/2011 5:08:23 AM PDT by fwdude ("When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf
The corruption though among people that can be considered heterosexual is also the result of the left-wing sexual revolution. Since the counter-culture the left-wing has promoted heavily the acceptance of corrupt behavior in regards to sexual behavior in society.

Exhibit A: Seinfeld


29 posted on 09/15/2011 5:29:06 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf
A distressing number of "heterosexuals" are involved in perverse sex identical to what's done by gays (up the rectum, down the throat, jerking off with porn); probably better than 80% of heterosexuals use contraceptives, which means they were already largely and deliberately turned away from natural sexuality.

West coast gay writer Richard Rodriguez observes that "Contraceptive couples are heterosexual gays." He's right about that: it's a rejection of our deep bodily meaning and function, focusing instead on sex-entertainment lite.

30 posted on 09/21/2011 7:34:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson