Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

'Net Zero'
1 posted on 09/26/2011 11:41:52 AM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Daffynition
Here is a defense budget item I would support cutting.
2 posted on 09/26/2011 11:43:55 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Anyone still really think we cannot balance the Fed Budget on spending cuts alone?

Let see, spend more for less efficient, less robust energy sources. If this had anything but a “green” label attached to it every Leftist in Congress would be screaming “Pentagon wasting money”


3 posted on 09/26/2011 11:44:44 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Agreed, cut this line item out. They should be building nuclear power plants on bases, not wind farms.


4 posted on 09/26/2011 11:46:20 AM PDT by MSF BU (YR'S Please Support our troops: JOIN THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

“....calls for the Army to use its land as equity to leverage about $7 billion in private investment”

Huh? No way.


6 posted on 09/26/2011 11:47:57 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
In Other News.........

Army, Marines could cut 150K troops


7 posted on 09/26/2011 11:48:45 AM PDT by KC_Lion (If Sarah can't be elected in 2012, then Phase II will fall into place, may G-D have mercy on us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

They’re going to use Army land as equity? For green energy projects? Are the Democrats really that brazen? I can understand some partisan politics, but is there no federal law enforcement person who will stand against this? This is throwing the country out the window to give money to Democrats.


8 posted on 09/26/2011 11:50:33 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

So now this regime will launder the handouts to their supporters via the Military (used as the middle-man), for worthless, un-economic, non-competitive green energy crap?


10 posted on 09/26/2011 11:50:51 AM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
There's no money to buy F22s but we can build solar power plants...That's crazy!

Mike

11 posted on 09/26/2011 11:51:27 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

In a forward operating zone, fuel delivery is a matter of life and death, both for the fuel truck drivers as well as the soldiers. In the far corners of Afghanistan, the fully-burdened cost of military fuel is around $40 per gallon.

13 posted on 09/26/2011 11:56:32 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

I’d just as soon the lights remain off after they repeal DODT, so I’m for green i.e. no energy in government buildings i.e. the barracks from this point on.


15 posted on 09/26/2011 11:58:45 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Let me guess without reading the article - solar panels? They seem to be so practical that every company producing them is highly profitable.


17 posted on 09/26/2011 12:02:52 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

A dumb and dumber politically-flavored idea.
This will end up costing more money and energy than it saves.

Blame this chick: Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment Katherine Hammack, an Ubama appointee.

http://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/bios/print/hammackprint.html


19 posted on 09/26/2011 12:32:57 PM PDT by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

As my granpappy use to say...that aintagonnawork!


20 posted on 09/26/2011 1:23:03 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Solar powered night vision goggles... What could possibly go wrong?

Mark


22 posted on 09/26/2011 1:26:10 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Missile defense = unimportant

Green energy and gay rights = very important.

This guy is dangerous.


26 posted on 09/26/2011 2:00:23 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

AFRL has demonstrated that it can make fuel out of grass, flowers, pretty much anything.


27 posted on 09/26/2011 2:45:16 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
The program calls for the Army to use its land as equity to leverage about $7 billion in private investment for the twenty projects.

Now Obama is using the military to launder kickbacks for his supporters. Is there no end to Chicago politics at the national level?

30 posted on 09/26/2011 2:55:23 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

The most important national security issue after border security is becoming energy independent.

The army is doing the right thing.

The solar and wind stuff is a side show and won’t yield cheap energy any time soon.

But the biofuel stuff will has great potential of yielding energy at below current costs within 2-3 years.

That would change the world.

Bully for the army.

The Obots are right on this one.


34 posted on 09/26/2011 3:13:29 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

The most important national security issue after border security is becoming energy independent.

The army is doing the right thing.

The solar and wind stuff is a side show and won’t yield cheap energy any time soon.

But the biofuel stuff will has great potential of yielding energy at below current costs within 2-3 years.

That would change the world.

Bully for the army.

The Obots are right on this one.


35 posted on 09/26/2011 3:13:56 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

It’s already started. Our base has solar panels on several new car ports for employees.


37 posted on 09/26/2011 3:33:18 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson