Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New material claimed to store more energy and cost less money than batteries
gizmag ^ | 9/29/11 | Ben Coxworth

Posted on 09/30/2011 7:33:05 PM PDT by dangerdoc

Researchers from the National University of Singapore's Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiative (NUSNNI) have created what they claim is the world's first energy-storage membrane. Not only is the material soft and foldable, but it doesn't incorporate liquid electrolytes that can spill out if it's damaged, it's more cost-effective than capacitors or traditional batteries, and it's reportedly capable of storing more energy.

The membrane is made from a polystyrene-based polymer, which is sandwiched between two metal plates. When charged by those plates, it can store the energy at a rate of 0.2 farads per square centimeter - standard capacitors, by contrast, can typically only manage an upper limit of 1 microfarad per square centimeter.

Due in part to the membrane's low fabrication costs, the cost of storing energy in it reportedly works out to 72 cents US per farad. According to the researchers, the cost for standard liquid electrolyte-based batteries is more like US$7 per farad. This in turn translates to an energy cost of 2.5 watt-hours per US dollar for lithium-ion batteries, whereas the membrane comes in at 10-20 watt-hours per dollar.

Details on how the material works, along with data on factors such as charging/discharging times and longevity have not yet been released. Principle investigator Dr. Xie Xian Ning, however, has stated "The performance of the membrane surpasses those of rechargeable batteries, such as lithium ion and lead-acid batteries, and supercapacitors."

The NUSNNI team is now looking into opportunities for commercializing the technology.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Complete vapor-ware but still interesting.
1 posted on 09/30/2011 7:33:07 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

interesting to see where it could lead if it does work


2 posted on 09/30/2011 7:36:21 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

One of these days we’ll have the breakthrough we need. Getting the energy density without the weight... Changes everything.


3 posted on 09/30/2011 7:38:49 PM PDT by Ramius (personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Maybe a great place to store our coal generated power.


4 posted on 09/30/2011 7:43:44 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
data on factors such as charging/discharging times and longevity have not yet been released

Well there's your problem.

5 posted on 09/30/2011 7:43:49 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

So basically per given size you could store 200,000 times more energy than a capacitor. I wonder what the max non destructive discharge current is. If it can be really high then these might make electric vehicles much more feasible.


6 posted on 09/30/2011 7:43:58 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Or instantly turn into plasma. Hmmm, plasma grenades......


7 posted on 09/30/2011 7:49:08 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Obama is prepared to give up to $1T to any Democrat donor who starts a company to manufacture these things for the electric car industry.


8 posted on 09/30/2011 7:54:50 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

I’d like to know the costs of producing this material.

It doesn’t help much if it is going to be tens of dollars to make this stuff when it costs just pennies to make lthium batteries.


9 posted on 09/30/2011 7:55:07 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

It could make tasers obsolete.


10 posted on 09/30/2011 7:56:43 PM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

“...a polystyrene-based polymer, which is sandwiched between two metal plates...”

My God! They’ve invented the capacitor! </S>


11 posted on 09/30/2011 7:59:38 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

bflr


12 posted on 09/30/2011 8:00:40 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Get your farads, damn cheap!


13 posted on 09/30/2011 8:02:27 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

From the article:

“Due in part to the membrane’s low fabrication costs, the cost of storing energy in it reportedly works out to 72 cents US per farad. According to the researchers, the cost for standard liquid electrolyte-based batteries is more like US$7 per farad. This in turn translates to an energy cost of 2.5 watt-hours per US dollar for lithium-ion batteries, whereas the membrane comes in at 10-20 watt-hours per dollar.”


14 posted on 09/30/2011 8:04:00 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Obama is prepared to give up to $1T to any Democrat donor who starts a company to manufacture these things for the electric car industry

The precondition is: The company must create at least 37 new union jobs over the next 50 years. /s

15 posted on 09/30/2011 8:05:02 PM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

That is very cheap.

No doubt the EPA must put a stop to it immediately.


16 posted on 09/30/2011 8:06:08 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

ping.


17 posted on 09/30/2011 8:09:49 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Wow coulombs too cheap to meter! I wonder what the breakdown voltage is?


18 posted on 09/30/2011 8:31:18 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Would it make solar more feasible too?


19 posted on 09/30/2011 8:36:25 PM PDT by GOPJ (Muslims will want to go to the moon when the Jews setup Israel there. - Dennis Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Would it make solar more feasible?


20 posted on 09/30/2011 8:36:44 PM PDT by GOPJ (Muslims will want to go to the moon when the Jews setup Israel there. - Dennis Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson