The document seems to describe two separate water streams: a small (no more than 10 liters/hour) stream being pumped through a pump, and a large (4554.3 liters over the duration of the test, or 1200 gallons). The small stream is being fed into the e-cat device, and the large stream is being fed into a heat exchanger attached to the e-cat device.
I also saw a video of a test from September, where the "water" being fed into the e-cat was being pumped from a plastic garbage can at a very slow rate (10 liters/hour would be a reasonable guess).
If this is an accurate description of the test, then it's easy to see how it could be faked. All Rossi would have to do is put a few gallons (about 10 gallons for a 4-hour test) of Hydrogen Peroxide (35% solution) in the bucket instead of water. The H2O2 would, upon contact with the Nickel, turn to water steam and Oxygen. Everything else about the test could be nothing more than subterfuge.
Has anyone verified that the "water" he is trickling into the e-cat (using the 10 liter/hour pump) is really water. Maybe in the next test, he should drink a glassful of it at the start of the test. If he survives longer than the e-cat runs, that would be a good indication that it wasn't Hydrogen Peroxide.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-
Re: [Vo]:Clear, odorless, water-based & combustible Jed Rothwell Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:40:23 -0700 Jones Beene wrote: In the category of clear water-based liquids which burn cleanly enough to >
be used indoors, and which could be confused with water in a testing >
arrangement (since it would be so unexpected as the ‘trick’ used to pull-off >
the deception) - there are several choices. >
How much would it cost to make 54 tons of it? That’s how much they would need for the 18-hour test. Might be hard to hide. - Jed