If you were truly skeptical, and truly a skeptic, you would be able to admit that, in light of just about every facet of Barky’s life narrative being either hidden or otherwise unverifiable, and given that he and his minions lie about virtually everything with the ease of fish breathing underwater, that maybe, just possibly, they’re lying about the birth narrative and “Obama”’s eligibility also.
I mean, otherwise why would the “Obama” team feel the need to post an obviously photoshopped image of a Long Form Birth Certificate on WH servers, if they have a copy of the Real McCoy? Or are you going to tell me that Albert Renshaw’s deconstruction of the image posted on WH servers on 27 April 2011 is a weak analysis?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
The fraud that is the “Obama” pResidency may not be exposed before his (single!) illegal term in office expires, and may in fact be allowed to stand in perpetuity as a nod to “reparations” for past racial wrongs against blacks, but that does not mean that the Constitution hasn’t been trampled in the process.
Those that abet, either through passivity or apology, his continued usurpation of the presidency however, are accessories to all of the illegal and even murderous acts (Fast and Furious, Libyan kinetic military action, the extra-judicial assassination of two US citizens without trial, even in absentia) carried out under the auspices of his illegitimate regime. For shame.
From my keyboard to God’s inbox.
I’m skeptical that Birthers have a rational grasp of this matter.
And...
Same guy?
If so, then I am indeed also pretty skeptical of 16 year olds who don’t yet understand how little they know.
OK, it is the same person.
So, you’ve either got a great genius who at 16 has invented an entirely new form of mathematics or a 16 year old who doesn’t yet know what he doesn’t know.
Your call.
Can a Birther really claim to be skeptical when they seem to believe anybody who comes down the pike as long as they say the things the Birther wants to believe?