[SkyPilot]

The ex cathedra claim that a designer is required is also a priori, and by that standard has nothing to do with logic.

How can the subject of God as the creator be "ex cathedra" when God is expressed in the affirmative, but in your world view to consider His very work is to be dismissed as illogical?

You used 50 cent words to say this: 'I don't even want to consider God, so I won't even consider it - and if you even bring it up, I'll attack the messenger as being unscientific and illogical.'

"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of people who suppress the truth by their unrighteousness, because what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them."

Romans 1: 18-19

[SunkenCiv]

How can the subject of God as the creator be "ex cathedra" when God is expressed in the affirmative, but in your world view to consider His very work is to be dismissed as illogical?

Because all of that gobbledygook you said right there doesn't have anything to do with what I said. This comes as no surprise to me, since it's clear you're just a troll on this thread.