Good article.
Given the reactions of those jokes called students at Penn State, there are no real men or women any more there in the student body.
Any university that considers mere sports more important than education....is not a university.
Real men, feminism, and political correctness are incomptable They cannot coexist. Guess which one gave out?
Were there any women on the scene? It seems to me that if there had been a nurse or someone of the female persuasion, the rapes would not have occurred and/or the coverup would have been exposed in a nanosecond.
Men simply can’t handle this stuff. Too much at stake.
Where have the real men gone?
Well, one factor is that if someone had intervened, then he could be charged with assault and battery himself. He would get involved in a long legal process, dragged throught the mud, etc.
Another factor is that Sandusky was a powerful person. You don’t take on powerful people without consequences. In our litigious society, some would think twice before getting involved as an adversary against someone in a position of power.
Ideally, someone coming up on someone raping a child, or committing any other crime, will intervene and stop the crime. But in this day and age, people have fear of doing that.
Fear of consequences is a strong motivator to NOT do “the right thing”, as so many talking heads are saying about this case. Just look at all the drive by shootings in the ghetto. People get shot all the time by these youth gangs, and there are never any witnesses. Nobody saw anything, though these shootings often happen on crowded city streets. The same concept could explain why people at Penn State allegedly knew about what was happening, but were afraid to say anything.
“Real men” go to jail or are shunned by society for violence and/or anything else a feminist, liberal can come up with for their actions. Men are to cower and wait for instructions on what to do from their wives or girlfriends. If you’re a white man you’re doubly screwed because you are to be taunted and taken advantage of as well.
Homosexual
This scorn of Sandusky's behavior does not fit into the gay agenda template. The trend these days is to accept this type of behavior as normal. Sandusky can't help it...he was "born this way". After all, there is a thriving organization, totally shielded by today's media and pop culture devoted completely to the rape of young boys by homosexual pedophiles.
I will probably get flamed for this but don’t blame ALL men. I can’t stand when a situation occurs and some men do something and everyone is blaming every guy in the room. The MEN that I know (in my family, my life and on FR) would have done the right thing. The young man that I am raising into adulthood, would have done the right thing. If someone wants to debate about sports vs. morality or acceptance of child rape... I’m all in. However, I am not ready to accept that men in general... the men that I know... would have accepted a scene of a man raping a little boy as casual. Just a thought.
If the recounted events actually took place, yes, a real man would have stopped it.
"....Some males -- we call them liberals -- often take women as their role models, with predictable results.
They regard auto-castration as the quintessence of civilization and sophistication. They aren't really assertive in a male way, but a catty or bitchy way, like the New York Times or their perfectly manless man, Obama. ....
In the triangulated war between liberals, Islamists, and the left, only one side can win. Our side will lose if we run out of real men because our feminized culture no longer creates enough of them.
We will lose if we allow the new cutural ideal of the feminized adultolescent male to become the ideal. We will lose if we forget that an upright and noble man with the capacity for righteous violence is at the very foundation of civilization.
Liberals sneer at such men, which is to say, men. I found a typical example by a college professor at dailykos, called A Pacifists Agony.
S/h/it writes that I've always hated the term war crime, since it's an insidious tautology. It implies that some wars are not crimes, and some of the atrocities committed during war are excusable by virtue of their context.
I believe that if there can be any single concept by which a civilization ought to be defined it's this: there is no context that can justify the intentional killing of a sentient being who does not wish it. Period. (Somehow, I'm sure there is a loophole for abortion.)
The professor's job is not to educate students but to make them politically aware, which in practice means to arrest their developmental journey toward adulthood, and especially manhood. It is a form of spiritual and intellectual body-snatching; for the boys, it means a fantasized acquisition of manhood, for the girls, contempt for it.
Before being undicktrinated, students are not particularly politically aware, but by semesters end, if all goes well, they will be different people.
They now understand the direct relationship between their own deliberately inculcated ignorance and the crimes that are committed in their name. They will have inverted reality, so that they imagine themselves to be Morally Superior to the primitive and murderous men who protect and defend them.
This is why the left must constantly attack and undermine America, for that is what allows their sense of moral superiority to flourish. But the attack brings with it the unconscious fear of father's retaliation, hence the hysterical fears of murderous retribution for "speaking truth" to Father -- fear of spying, of theocratic takeovers, of Al Gore's world melting. When leftists say that George Bush is the world's greatest terrorist, they mean it, although it goes without saying that they have no insight into the unconscious basis of this hysterical projection of their own fear converted to anger and persecution. .....
.....As every psychoanalytically informed psychologist knows, there is the patient, there is the truth, and there is the truth they would like to deny, which is why they are in your office.
Truth has a life of its own, and has a way of insisting its way into the patients discourse, try as they might to prevent it from doing so.
The truth is true, and doesnt actually require anyone to think it. But this is not so of the lie. The lie is entirely parasitic on a thinker. Furthermore, the liar implicitly knows the truth, otherwise it couldn't lie about it. Pacifism is just such a lie, for it contains the truth to which it is a reaction: ."..the blood of men who are far better than I, men who stand ready to do violence against the forces of evil that have made a moment like this and a person like me possible. And it's more than I can bear." ~ Chomsky
Yes, that would require growing up and facing the unpleasant Truth
bttt
Real men have stood in opposition to the “change” this country has taken since say 1968 or so. We’ve been vilified, harassed, ridiculed, called barbaric, and had our own daughters and wives taught to hate us and see us as their enemy. We’re DONE!!! Even good women have swallowed many of these lies. Every watch Survivor on TV? Has there EVER been one single season where the women did not get together at some point and decide to try and align themselves against everyone with a p*nis? It’s RAMPANT!!
To be perfectly honest, I think we’ve just decided to sit this one out. That is until the ashes of the society WE CREATED is all that’s left. Fine! You want it, you can have it! WE BUILT IT! WE CREATED IT! WE DREAMED IT AND THEN WE CONSTRUCTED IT!! OUR FATHERS BLOOD WAS SPILLED FOR IT!
I for one am sick and tired of being blamed for every single human sin from the beginning of time! Not just by the left but by every d*mn fool that’s excepted their premise. You know, the type that label me “heartless” because I want my country secured from outside invaders? Those kind. They can keep it! LET THEM RUN IT UNTIL IT BURNS!!! Then come talk to me. Come talk to me about the need for REAL men. Talk to me about the need for justice. Talk to me about the need for discipline. Talk to me about the cruelty of the world and religions of peace! Talk to me about law and order. Talk to me about the RIGHT to self defense. Talk to me then about WHAT MAKES A REAL NATION!
Until then, I’m done! That being said, if I see some punk buggering a boy I’ll tear his freakin head off on the spot! Then YOU STEP UP FOR ME AND EXPLAIN WHY I SHOULDN’T BE RAPED IN PRISON FOR MY ACTIONS! For now, I’m just simply over it.
Can't produce men unless you honor masculine virtues.
What Sandusky did to that little boy in the shower is done EVERY DAY in Islamic countries, and when Islam tightens its grip on America, you'll see more of it, with absolutely no outrage from the media. The church has been feminized and dumbed-down to where most so-called Christians don't think it's a sin to poke another man in the rear end, so why should these girly-men complain when Sandusky gets some boy-tail? Evil? Half of Americans wouldn't know it if it was poking them in the tail.
The America we knew is over. The faster we get to the collapse, the faster renewal will come.