Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm

Newt can ‘claim’ conservatism, he sat on that couch. That did him in. He sat on that couch.


11 posted on 11/10/2011 5:44:19 PM PST by Indy Pendance (\\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Indy Pendance

Cooties from Peloosi from the couch, yuck. But, she is under investigation, you know for her, uh, green investments. The solyndra thing and something about ethics and thievery.
So there should be some distance opening, some reality of thinking about where this was all coming from in the pump and dump investment world, and they hooked Newt too. I’m more upset he was “dialoging” with Hitlery. Beltway banditry.

All mirrors and smoke, just like this absolute harridan, whose daddy was mayor of baltimore and ran the democratic machine there. She moved to and looks like her constituency from the Castro district of San Fran (they luuuuv who they hate). Imagine waking up to that w/ or w/out makeup.


31 posted on 11/10/2011 6:01:07 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance

“Newt can ‘claim’ conservatism, he sat on that couch. That did him in. He sat on that couch.”

I’m with you. That couch move is scary stuff. I can forgive a Republican who has a dinner with Muzzie leader who is identified with supporting terrorism, for two reasons:
1) Every Muslim leader supports terrorism, so no choice there if you want to be seen with one.
2) Republicans know next to nothing about Islam

But for Heaven’s Sake. Newt knows EXACTLY who Pelosi is and EXACTLY what she stands for. I realize that I’m a Cain supporter...and therefore support him over Newt anyway, but even so, there is still NO EXCUSE for what Newt did. It wasn’t just a brain fart at a debate, it was something that he had a LOT of time to think about and consider the implications.

...and to this day, we’ll never know for sure if it was that advertisement that convinced Justice Anthony Kennedy to give the EPA the right to regulate carbon. And the Court does get influenced by stunts like that, when they think the country is unified in wanting to go that way.


44 posted on 11/10/2011 6:28:27 PM PST by BobL (Send Rove a Message, VOTE CAIN, no matter what)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson