Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

The problem is this method does nothing for chemical contaminates, which are just as likely and can be just as deadly as most biological contaminates.


4 posted on 11/23/2011 8:35:36 PM PST by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Kartographer

True. But that’s kind of a choice people need to make based on simple intelligence and awareness.

I’m not going to collect water that flows out of a Dow treatment plant to drink. Or collect water near a cattle farm or place that might be contaminated with large amounts of agricultural runoff.

This method has one BIG advantage. It kills the pathogens that cause water borne diseases that can kill you literally in a day or two!


7 posted on 11/23/2011 8:49:58 PM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer
Unless you are getting your water downstream from a chemical waste dump or contaminated mine tailing's; the chances of you being able to drink enough naturally, chemically, contaminated water to cause you any harm as close to 0 as makes no difference. Now remember we are talking about fresh water, not salt or sea water here. All natural water is contaminated with chemical and mineral contaminants; it is the nature of the beast, water is the perfect solvent and over time it will dissolve any thing. The biologicals in water are the true danger to some one in the field and proper precautions should always be taken.
15 posted on 11/23/2011 9:25:59 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson