To: djf
The problem is this method does nothing for chemical contaminates, which are just as likely and can be just as deadly as most biological contaminates.
4 posted on
11/23/2011 8:35:36 PM PST by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer
True. But that’s kind of a choice people need to make based on simple intelligence and awareness.
I’m not going to collect water that flows out of a Dow treatment plant to drink. Or collect water near a cattle farm or place that might be contaminated with large amounts of agricultural runoff.
This method has one BIG advantage. It kills the pathogens that cause water borne diseases that can kill you literally in a day or two!
7 posted on
11/23/2011 8:49:58 PM PST by
djf
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
To: Kartographer
Unless you are getting your water downstream from a chemical waste dump or contaminated mine tailing's; the chances of you being able to drink enough naturally, chemically, contaminated water to cause you any harm as close to 0 as makes no difference. Now remember we are talking about fresh water, not salt or sea water here. All natural water is contaminated with chemical and mineral contaminants; it is the nature of the beast, water is the perfect solvent and over time it will dissolve any thing. The biologicals in water are the true danger to some one in the field and proper precautions should always be taken.
15 posted on
11/23/2011 9:25:59 PM PST by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson