Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV’s quiet ad-justment
New York Post ^ | December 4, 2011 | SUSANNAH CAHALAN

Posted on 12/04/2011 5:22:36 PM PST by ConservativeStatement

They’ll still be annoying — but soon TV commercials won’t hurt your ears.

A law mandating a volume cap on ear-splitting commercials will go into effect Dec. 15, at which point broadcasters have a year to turn down the volume.

“The intent of the act is simple: to make the volume of commercials and programs uniform so that the spikes don’t affect the consumer,” said Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), who sponsored the legislation last year.

People will be uncupping their ears in joy.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: ads; commercials; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2011 5:22:44 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
Some talk shows could use a few lessons about treble and bass, too.

And while I'm at it ... NEVER use a police or ambulance siren ... nor a ringing phone ... for your stupid commercials.

2 posted on 12/04/2011 5:29:00 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Really? Let’s just legislate every single aspect of life. This is stupid.


3 posted on 12/04/2011 5:30:39 PM PST by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement; humblegunner; Eaker; Allegra; TheMom

4 posted on 12/04/2011 5:30:46 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Common sense from Congress finally. How long has this been an irritation to each of us that served no useful purpose? Why couldn’t they just mandate uniform volume levels between channels, commercials and advertisements 20 years ago?

I’ll bet each of us could list a number of common sense items such as political spam calls that need ended yesterday, but are permitted to persist because of politics or some other absurd reason.


5 posted on 12/04/2011 5:31:22 PM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

That’s good news. Funny how they some tvs sound are terrible like Panasonic; however, I can always hear the commercials really well. LOL I have always wondered if your provider has something to do with this?


6 posted on 12/04/2011 5:32:23 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger

This is one ‘stupid’ law that I don’t mind.

My stepfather has a heart condition and it startles him every time. Especially if he is dozing off.

So that they can make a buck doesn’t make it right.


7 posted on 12/04/2011 5:32:32 PM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger

Not stupid. Uniform levels mean I can finally set the volume to where I want it — and leave it there! — without having to turn it down at every commercial break, only to turn it right back up again when the show resumes. How pointless, and irritating, is that ritual?


8 posted on 12/04/2011 5:36:20 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s called “AVC” - Automatic Volume Control. The console radios people listened to Amos & Andy on had it. This is deliberate on the part of the cable and media companies to promote their commercials over the content, and regulating this as a technical matter is within the legitimate scope of federal authority. It’s just a shame the industry doesn’t have the pride to set high standards for itself.


9 posted on 12/04/2011 5:44:41 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevao

I thought this was suppose to be done back in the 70’s..


10 posted on 12/04/2011 5:46:31 PM PST by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: knarf

My dog goes nutz with a certain ad that has a door bell sounds just like ours


11 posted on 12/04/2011 5:53:59 PM PST by al baby (Is that old windbag still on the air ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
Audio engineers who've studied the problem note it's NOT the sound level, but the level of audio processing that makes commercials much more annoying to listen to. This means from now on commercials must expand the signal to noise ratio so it sounds more "natural" like the actual TV program itself.
12 posted on 12/04/2011 5:56:53 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s not the spikes, it’s the average and the RMS that are higher.


13 posted on 12/04/2011 5:57:49 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Wow, imagine what all I’ll be able to accomplish during commercials with all the time this will free up!

Now if there was just a way to turn down the “background” music but not the dialogue during the show.


14 posted on 12/04/2011 5:58:44 PM PST by TropicanaRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
This is deliberate on the part of the cable and media companies to promote their commercials over the content, and regulating this as a technical matter is within the legitimate scope of federal authority. It’s just a shame the industry doesn’t have the pride to set high standards for itself.

True. High standards would mean offering a la carte programming instead of the current practice of network welfare. I'd rather pay $40/month for ten channels I actually watch than twice that for 300 I could not care less about. I know that will never happen --- too many liberal networks would collapse overnight if they actually had to depend on earning their own keep instead of automatically getting a share of the "bundle" paid by each subscriber to a tier of channels. Yeah, MSNBC, I'm talkin' about you.
15 posted on 12/04/2011 5:59:38 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Root Mean Square?


16 posted on 12/04/2011 6:01:01 PM PST by al baby (Is that old windbag still on the air ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I take care of that problem by muting all commercials on all TV shows I watch, which I have to admit isn’t many. I’m sick of the same old same old stuff appearing on the news EVERY night in the same order. Punt ‘em!


17 posted on 12/04/2011 6:04:06 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I don’t know if anyone at the station gives a hoot, but the nanosecond a blaring commercial comes on, I hit the MUTE button. I couldn’t care less what they are selling.


18 posted on 12/04/2011 6:07:35 PM PST by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

So now they’ll just lower the treble on the programs.
Amusing that TV viewers think they are customers, when they are actually the product!

Why are the shows so idiotic? Because advertisers naturally pay more for stupid customers. It’s simple.


19 posted on 12/04/2011 6:10:09 PM PST by mrsmith (Elect a 'Tea Party' Majority Leader in 2012 or we're DOOMED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

You got that right. Advertising agencies over process the audio for both TV and radio commercials before sending them to the broadcast stations.


20 posted on 12/04/2011 6:11:44 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson