[Neverforget01]

If there was ANY proof to your allegations the grand jury would have indicted Paterno after a three year investigation. He didn't cover up anything and there is zero evidence he knew of anything other than the vague story he heard from McQueary and reported.

[allmendream]

What specifically are you claiming I alleged that was not true?

That Paterno received a credible report more than 10 years ago that Sandusky was sexually abusing a young boy in the shower?

That Paterno then hired the guy who reported it to him and he worked for Paterno for the next ten years - making it look like Paterno thought he was credible?

That Sandusky continued to parade around youth from his “Second Mile” so called charity for “at risk” youth for the next ten years - while Paterno KNEW what they were actually “at risk” for?

That Paterno saw, for the next ten years, after a very credible report of shower sodomy from someone he would pursue a working relationship with over that time, Sandusky continuing to parade young boys around the campus and events in “Happy” valley?

Please be specific.

[ZX12R]

If there was ANY proof to your allegations the grand jury would have indicted Paterno after a three year investigation. He didn't cover up anything and there is zero evidence he knew of anything other than the vague story he heard from McQueary and reported.

Paterno DID cover it up, as did McQueary and anyone else that knew, by not reporting it to the campus police, and instead decided to keep the information within the university administration. Also, rather than a vague story, I thought Paterno was informed by an actual eye witness to the molestation, which was McQueary?