Knowing that, the judge simply did not want to be the one who went against a sitting president, since he wouldn’t be the final rule anyway. So, he played it safe.
The significant thing that happened here was that by allowing the case to be heard, he gave it standing and let it into the system.
This will be decided by the USSC, or not at all.
Praying you're right.
I believe we're getting there, but there are a lot of switchbacks and hairpin curves as we ascend the mountain.
“Stop gasping for breath, people. Think it through - no matter who won at this level, it would be appealed.”
Maybe I am overly optimistic and looking at this as the “glass half full”. But perhaps Malahi has done the plaintiffs a favor in this ruling? If he had judged this in favor of the plaintiffs, it would only be a recommendation to the SOS and may not go anywhere after that. Or even if the SOS did rule against Obama, he could just give up on Georgia and move along since Georgia is a red state anyway.
With this outcome, the plaintiffs now have the opportunity to continue the appeals process to a higher court. Isn’t it in their best interest for this to be appealed all the way to SCOTUS??
That Indiana case MUST be appealed.
That abomination is a massive corrupt hurdle.
That ought to be the next step IMHO.