Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NoGrayZone
You are the one calling it a problem and in a huff. Drudge is only reporting what the opposition knows. Isn't it better to be prepared and defend the statements?

Actually, you really don't know who Drudge supports. Unfortunately, there are many people who are emotionally fragile when it comes to the current primary situation and can't handle any perceived slight even when it is not intended as such. FreeRepublic has a huge number of very weak kneed people who turn and run at the slightest mention of something that offends them such as the Satan warning. They pretend someone is out to get Santorum.

Gosh, Santorum is correct. Shouldn't they be cheering instead?

34 posted on 02/21/2012 2:58:54 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Dave W

Actually, there is no doubt WHATSOEVER who Drudge supports.

But, who cares!!??

Willard the Lib has Drudge.

Newtorum has Jim Robinson.

Game on.


37 posted on 02/21/2012 3:03:44 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Dave W
"Actually, you really don't know who Drudge supports."

Hmmm, let's see. drudge has been attacking Newt and Santorum, but "highlights" mittens.

Gee, that's a hard one to figure out.

40 posted on 02/21/2012 3:05:48 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson