Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kodak Kills Off Its Color Reversal Films
PETAPIXEL ^ | Mar. 01, 2012 | swampsniper

Posted on 03/01/2012 5:40:05 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER

Kodak announced today that it has decided to discontinue its color reversal (AKA slide) films due to a steady decrease in sales and usage. The films discontinued are Ektachrome E100G/E100VS and Elite Chrome Extra Color 100. The company estimates that based on current sales pace, you’ll still be able to purchase the discontinued films for about six to nine months. If you were a loyal Kodak slide film shooter, it’ll soon be time to switch over to negative film or to Fujifilm color reversal films.

(Excerpt) Read more at petapixel.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Chit/Chat; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: film; kodak

1 posted on 03/01/2012 5:40:10 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

My Nikon 8008 has been pretty much worthless for a while now.


2 posted on 03/01/2012 5:45:27 PM PST by Mrs. P (Figures can lie, and liars can figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. P
The camera not worth much, the lenses may be worth something.

My Minolta XTSi brings about 30 bucks now, in excellent condition, but the lens in this picture is still worth over 200 bucks.

MINOLTA MAXXUM XTSI

3 posted on 03/01/2012 5:54:41 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. P

http://www.keh.com/camera/Nikon-Autofocus-Camera-Bodies/1/sku-NA020001055000?r=FE


4 posted on 03/01/2012 5:55:50 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Whats film?

bump


5 posted on 03/01/2012 6:01:46 PM PST by Delta 21 (Make your choice ! There are NO civilians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21; SWAMPSNIPER
Whats film?

I think it's that clear plastic sheet which covers the LCD viewer on new cameras.

6 posted on 03/01/2012 6:04:54 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

And for good reason.

That lens will make great pictures on a new Sony camera.


7 posted on 03/01/2012 6:17:06 PM PST by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Yeah, it's got a great big hole right up the middle, it will almost shoot in the dark, LOL

The old Minolta "legacy" lenses are a great reason to shoot a Sony.

8 posted on 03/01/2012 6:32:03 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I’m in the same position with a Canon A-1. I’ve got lenses professionals paid dearly for in the 1980’s, that probably couldn’t be made today. There were rumors of someone making “digital backs” for these cameras, but I don’t think that’s going to happen.


9 posted on 03/01/2012 7:55:56 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
I've a Nikon FM black body camera...........

I've 6 lenses that fit the body.

It's my understanding...that there is a digital Nikon...that will "take" those lenses. Not sure if that is true. Anyone know?

10 posted on 03/01/2012 8:01:07 PM PST by Osage Orange (Why do we eat Soylindra Green?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Getting closer to that day we hear the words...”Kodak to discontinue all operations”.

How the mighty have fallen....


11 posted on 03/01/2012 8:23:31 PM PST by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

A problem with manual focus lenses on digital bodies is that most digital cameras don’t have a focus screen designed for them. You can set them up that way but it’s expensive. The camera may not be able to couple with the aperture, that means you have to do that manually as well.


12 posted on 03/01/2012 8:49:09 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Almost all of the Nikon F series is compatible with all the DX series cameras. They don’t work with the D40 and the like, but not otherwise a problem. Nikon has done a great job of maintaining compatibility.


13 posted on 03/01/2012 10:37:47 PM PST by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Anyone interested in a Minolta X370 with 35-70mm, 70-210mm, 500mm, 2x multiplier, gadget bag, lens paper, etc?

.

Just kidding. Digital still has a ways to go to overtake the quality of film.

14 posted on 03/02/2012 6:28:08 PM PST by Sarajevo (Money cannot buy happiness, but it's more comfortable to cry in a Mercedes than on a bicycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

What a hoot. Last time I checked on it’s value, it was around 40 bucks.

I have a macro lens and a zoom. I would love to use them, need to figure out if I could use them on a digital camera.

I just recently got myself a point and shoot digital with an attached zoom lens but it’s not the same as the Nikon was.


15 posted on 03/03/2012 4:45:41 AM PST by Mrs. P (Figures can lie, and liars can figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. P
There are some really good DSLR bodies not much more expensive than a good point and shoot. The difference is like night and day.

I've got a little Nikon L110 for a drag anywhere camera, compared to my DSLR it is an aggravating toy. It just won't produce what I want in most cases.

16 posted on 03/03/2012 5:19:46 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Afraid of that...........


17 posted on 03/03/2012 6:40:45 PM PST by Osage Orange (Why do we eat Soylindra Green?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson