Really? Because if I was on the other side and had their mentality and means, I’d take him out no questions asked. If I could verify that he’s got videos that could completely wreck Zero’s presidency, and considering the ruthless nature of that group, it’s a logical conclusion.
If I were the head of an opposing concern that had the means, mentality, and morality to do take out George Soros, I’d do it in a heartbeat. High value target causing great destruction to his opposition - he would be very much worth the risk to someone with alot to lose.
When you have a Alpha 1 priority asset you protect it at all costs, even if that means taking out another high profile target to do it. You spare no expense and use the absolute best people to do it.
Did they do it? I don’t know. It could just be the crappiest of luck. But Breitbart was a high enough value target to be worth the risk, that is for sure. Heart attacks are easily induced with chemicals that leave no trace.
I would like to know if the cover story of him having heart problems is actually true and there is medical proof of that. That would tell you alot.
Good question, his father-in-law might be lying and actually an integral part of the assassination........