No, really? Is war not due in part to higher levels of aggression in men?
War is due to property and envy—but, men ALWAYS had to protect their women and raise their children or they would die. Without fighting, there would never have been the property rights that were enshrined in American Law by brilliant white men.
All people will fight for life-—it is just women were weak and having babies so they were useless in war. Without men, the women and children were dead—they wouldn’t have survived. It was stressful for men to have to make sure their family had food and shelter and were protected since caveman days. Women oppression is just different difficulties than man’s difficulties-—life is hardship—life oppresses all—even kings. This idea that women are the only group oppressed is silly (and Marxist—divide and conquer).
“No, really? Is war not due in part to higher levels of aggression in men?”
So, Elizabeth I, Indira Ghandi, and Golda Meir were men? Women leaders engage in war too.