Skip to comments.Booted out for being born a boy: Transgender beauty queen kicked out of Miss Universe
Posted on 03/27/2012 10:57:59 AM PDT by billorites
A beauty pageant has booted a contestant out the competition after discovering the buxom blonde was born a boy.
The Miss Universe Canada organizers threw out Jenna Talackova when they found out she had undergone surgery to become a woman.
The transgendered contestant had already successfully reached the finals in the Miss Vancouver pageant before she was banned from continuing in the competition.
Although the pageant organizers described Talackova as a real girl they disqualified her arguing that the rules state that each contestant must be a naturally born female.
According to Denis Davila, the national director of Miss Universe Canada, Talackova claimed on her registration form she was born a female.
But becoming suspicious Davila confronted the 23-year-old about her sex change and the contestant admitted she was actually born a male.
Despite her pleas to stay in the pageant her confession meant that she was pulled from the contest that same day.
'She feels like a real girl and she is a real girl. She didnt expect people to question it,' Davila told thestar.com.
'She was hoping we could put her back in the competition, but the rules are very clear and theres no way we can go back on it.'
The decision from the Miss Universe Canada pageant, which is owned by Donald Trump, has sparked outrage with people calling for Jenna to be reinstated into the contest.
In a YouTube interview Talackova says she knew she was a female at the age of four and began hormone therapy ten years later.
And the 23-year-old beauty queen, who has competed in Miss Universe pageants and transgendered pageants before, says that she surgically changed her gender aged 19.
I regard myself as a woman with a history, Talackova says winking to the camera.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The photos leave me feeling confused.
“...I regard myself as a woman with a history, Talackova says winking to the camera....”
Yeah, that’s all fine and good, but what about that X-Y chromosome thingy? You can change the color of paint on a car but what’s inside is still the same. Externally you may be considered a female but inside is a tad bit different.
He’s been on hormones since 14 and had ‘things’ cut off at 19. Stop the hormone treatments and you wouldn’t be confused for long. Those are skinny, man legs.
Looks like Trump’s daughter
With gorgeous looks like that, that “person” would have had a terrible life as a “man”, unreal.
Guaranteed...Laz would hit that! It would be hard for any heterosexual man not to consider it also, unless of course...but for many that wouldn’t matter. That is one hot potato.
That's a helluva paint job.
New upholstery as well it seems.
Admit it...you sneaked a look. LOL!
Looks like one of the Kardashians in the face...
There is always something that gives them away. Definitely the legs on this one.
I’m kind of suprised at all the men being turned on by this creature?
Check out the feet on the s/he. Looks manly to me.
I see many women at the beach/gym with those types of legs. I would have a very difficult time knowing this was a man to begin with TBH if someone did not tell me.
Her legs don’t look any different than Ann Coulter’s and her bosom may be larger than Ann’s.
Are you hitting the Budweiser already?
Just stating the facts.
Just having some fun at her/him expense. This was a successful beauty queen, not some mall pageant, but a Miss Universe contestant. However it is undeniable unless you are blind or can’t see that is one pretty picture.
But like a pretty picture, the truth is sometimes something different. As far as getting turned on...Laz hasn’t spoken yet.
Good point about the legs. I’ve always kinda envied old dudes their legs. You’ll see old men on the tennis court, maybe with a little cut, but they have those skinny legs.
Don't forget about the stick shift and drive shaft ;)
And equipment previously deemed not optional, apparently now is...
“There is always something that gives them away. Definitely the legs on this one.”
Ugh, you want sex with a guy as an option? Hmmm.
My 15 year old son summed it up nicely when we saw this on the news today: “What do his chromosomes have to say?”
Many of America’s left-wing “double X” women could benefit greatly from a makeup and grooming course taught by the he-she’s........
Apparently you think this was a real question and not a joke. Yes, it was a joke.
I’ll take Wilson....
That is probably one of the most disgusting comments I have ever seen on FR.
Prettier than any democrat in Congress, or Janine Garafalo.
-—She feels like a real girl and she is a real girl.-—
I feel like Superman. I am Superman.
Looks a little like “Phoebe” on “Friends.”
How do they get rid of the Adam’s Apple?
I’d go with Wilson!
Doesn’t talk back and agrees with virtually everything I say.
And pretty laid back.
We’d have a ball!
This is so wrong on so many levels. “Her” breasts are bigger than mine. }:(
Did the esptrogen injection change the shape of “her” hips?
A guy should not have such a feminine shape.
I feel bad for the guy who believes that this man is really a woman and goes out with “her”.
How much do you wanna bet that “she” will get socked in the jaw and have “her” lights knocked out?
It’s gonna happen. Mark my words.
No kidding, sparky. Did you think my reply was not sarcasm?
Who had the job of investigating how she feels?
LOL, we all are awaiting Laz’s comments. I think he is pondering the deep ramifications of answering this post. This could blow his whole deal, there’s a lot riding on the line for him on this one, and the whole FR hangs on the edge of it’s seat awaiting his response ...
Deliberate misrepresentation on the part of the writer.
No - NO ONE was “booted out for being a boy.”
Someone was booted out for a grotesque and yet willful act of deliberate, dunderheaded hubris; i.e., being sufficently stupid to think that entering a women’s beauty contest was possible for a male, provided that said male, for whatever reason, “wanted” an exception to be made in HIS case.
This whole “sex change” nonsense has gone light years too far.
If you’re an effing male, with male genes and equipment, but you want to be (or think you are!) a female, get a good psychiatrist, for Pete’s sake.
But whatever you do, DO NOT ask me to (or even worse, demand that I) live in your dystopian fantasy world.
Setting aside for a moment the disturbing practice of treating a mental issue (thinking you are the opposite sex from what you are born) by chemically and surgically altering the body. If you are going to “convert” a man into a woman, it is more successful the younger the subject is when the process begins.
That is why the proponents of this process push hormone blockers and the like on pre-adolescent patients. If you prevent male puberty, then it is easier to introduce female hormones and a form of “female” puberty, (hips, breast growth and the like) occurs instead.
Then you have surgery on the genitals and possibly some other cosmetic surgery. And you have an end product that is almost indistinguishable from a natural woman, lacking only the internal reproductive plumbing.
A post pubescent male is more difficult, because you have to “undo” male puberty.
All you have to do is believe that the best solution to a possible mental health issue, diagnosed on the word of a child or adolescent is $50,000+ worth of hormone treatments and surgeries.
It’s a bio-engineering marvel. Common sense not required.
That's the problem, a psychiatrist is the person who started the process by telling a confused boy and his parents: "You're right, you really are a girl. Start transitioning now and I'll put you on hormones."*
* Simplified, but in essence that's what happens. the mental issue is not addressed, instead the offending body parts are treated as the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.