[freedumb2003]

>>How about logically demonstrating the rationale for giving this negligent mother a pass while justifying prosecution of a father for insufficiently securing his firearms?<<

Why don’t you logically defend the actions of the Bush Administration’s Patriot act while giving a pass to allowing Paula Dean using real butter in her cooking?

It is bad enough you use so many fallacies, but false dichotomy? God, you make it too easy. There are only 3 or 4 left before you exhaust the entire base of fallacies.

I don’t want to create new forensic theory but if you continue on this path I may need to.

(btw: if it wasn’t for the tragic life of a child you want to politicize, this would be a hoot)

[papertyger]

It is bad enough you use so many fallacies, but false dichotomy? God, you make it too easy. There are only 3 or 4 left before you exhaust the entire base of fallacies

How would you know?

Your ignorance of the one fallacy you've referred to has now been proven beyond any dispute.

Do you now get credibility for expanding on your proven ignorance?