That’s merely the conventional pseudochronology, which was devised to undermine the veracity of the Bible. And, it continues to do so.
How does it undermine the veracity of the Bible?
That’s merely the conventional pseudochronology, which was devised to undermine the veracity of the Bible.
.........
I’m not sure that I understand this. I have seen several chronologies. I don’t think that there is any agreed on chronology as yet. But one of them is likely to be right. How does one vs another undermine the OT.
Generally the OT is a very good source book/history for events of the 1st millenium bc. Its a little more sketchy about events of the 2nd millenium bc.